Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38273984›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare informatics research2024

Interpretable Predictive Models to Understand Risk Factors for Maternal and Fetal Outcomes.

Tomas M Bosschieter, Zifei Xu, Hui Lan, Benjamin J Lengerich, Harsha Nori, Ian Painter, Vivienne Souter, Rich Caruana

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare informatics research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tomas M BosschieterStanford University, Stanford, CA USA.
Zifei XuStanford University, Stanford, CA USA.
Hui LanStanford University, Stanford, CA USA.
Benjamin J LengerichMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA USA.
Harsha NoriMicrosoft Research, Redmond, WA USA.
Ian PainterFoundation for Healthcare Quality, Seattle, WA USA.
Vivienne SouterFoundation for Healthcare Quality, Seattle, WA USA.
Rich CaruanaMicrosoft Research, Redmond, WA USA.
Stanford University · USFoundation for Health Care Quality · USMicrosoft (United States) · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although most pregnancies result in a good outcome, complications are not uncommon and can be associated with serious implications for mothers and babies. Predictive modeling has the potential to improve outcomes through a better understanding of risk factors, heightened surveillance for high-risk patients, and more timely and appropriate interventions, thereby helping obstetricians deliver better care. We identify and study the most important risk factors for four types of pregnancy complications: (i) severe maternal morbidity, (ii) shoulder dystocia, (iii) preterm preeclampsia, and (iv) antepartum stillbirth. We use an Explainable Boosting Machine (EBM), a high-accuracy glass-box learning method, for the prediction and identification of important risk factors. We undertake external validation and perform an extensive robustness analysis of the EBM models. EBMs match the accuracy of other black-box ML methods, such as deep neural networks and random forests, and outperform logistic regression, while being more interpretable. EBMs prove to be robust. The interpretability of the EBM models reveal surprising insights into the features contributing to risk (e.g., maternal height is the second most important feature for shoulder dystocia) and may have potential for clinical application in the prediction and prevention of serious complications in pregnancy.

Indexed as

AI for healthcareExplainable modelsInterpretabilityPreeclampsiaPregnancy complicationsStillbirth

Identifiers

PMID38273984
PMCPMC10805688
OpenAlexW4387615836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.