ArticleJournal of healthcare informatics research2024
Contextual Word Embedding for Biomedical Knowledge Extraction: a Rapid Review and Case Study.
Article in Journal of healthcare informatics research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- SEFA: Semantic Embedding-Based Feature Augmentation of Biomedical Language-Model Embeddings Improves Interpretable Metabolomic Prediction of Lung Cancer.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Large language models improve transferability of electronic health record-based predictions across countries and coding systems.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Representation of Medical Concepts in Emojis Using Medical Subject Headings to Identify Gaps and Opportunities: Cross-Sectional Analysis.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Ontology enrichment using a large language model: Applying lexical, semantic, and knowledge network-based similarity for concept placement.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2025Article
- A novel dual embedding few-shot learning approach for classifying bone loss using orthopantomogram radiographic notes.Head & face medicine · 2025Article
- Applications of Large Language Models in Pathology.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advancements in natural language processing (NLP), particularly contextual word embedding models, have improved knowledge extraction from biomedical and healthcare texts. However, limited comprehensive research compares these models. This study conducts a scoping review and compares the performance of the major contextual word embedding models for biomedical knowledge extraction. From 26 articles identified from Scopus, PubMed, PubMed Central, and Google Scholar between 2017 and 2021, 18 notable contextual word embedding models were identified. These include ELMo, BERT, BioBERT, BlueBERT, CancerBERT, DDS-BERT, RuBERT, LABSE, EhrBERT, MedBERT, Clinical BERT, Clinical BioBERT, Discharge Summary BERT, Discharge Summary BioBERT, GPT, GPT-2, GPT-3, and GPT2-Bio-Pt. A case study compared the performance of six representative models-ELMo, BERT, BioBERT, BlueBERT, Clinical BioBERT, and GPT-3-across text classification, named entity recognition, and question answering. The evaluation utilized datasets comprising biomedical text from tweets, NCBI, PubMed, and clinical notes sourced from two electronic health record datasets. Performance metrics, including accuracy and F1 score, were used. The results of this case study reveal that BioBERT performs the best in analyzing biomedical text, while Clinical BioBERT excels in analyzing clinical notes. These findings offer crucial insights into word embedding models for researchers, practitioners, and stakeholders utilizing NLP in biomedical and clinical document analysis. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41666-023-00157-y.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.