Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38273891›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Prognostic and predictive value of ultrasound-based estimated ankle brachial pressure index at early follow-up after endovascular revascularization of chronic limb-threatening ischaemia: a prospective, single-centre, service evaluation.

Alexander D Rodway, Lydia Hanna, Jenny Harris, Rachael Jarrett, Charlotte Allan, Felipe Pazos Casal, Benjamin C T Field, Martin B Whyte, Nikolaos Ntagiantas, Ivan Walton and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Estimation of toe brachial index based on forefoot Doppler waveforms.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander D RodwayVascular Medicine Department, Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Redhill, UK.
Lydia HannaImperial College London, London, UK.
Jenny HarrisSchool of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Rachael JarrettVascular Medicine Department, Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Redhill, UK.
Charlotte AllanVascular Medicine Department, Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Redhill, UK.
Felipe Pazos CasalVascular Medicine Department, Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Redhill, UK.
Benjamin C T FieldVascular Medicine Department, Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Redhill, UK.
Martin B WhyteDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Nikolaos NtagiantasVascular Medicine Department, Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Redhill, UK.
Ivan WaltonVascular Medicine Department, Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Redhill, UK.
Ajay PankhaniaVascular Medicine Department, Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Redhill, UK.
Simon S SkeneDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Gary D MaythamVascular Medicine Department, Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Redhill, UK.
Christian HeissVascular Medicine Department, Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Redhill, UK.
University of Surrey · GBSurrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust · GBSt George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBImperial College London · GBUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ankle brachial pressure index can be estimated (eABPI) using cuffless ankle Doppler ultrasound. We evaluated the prognostic value of eABPI measured during pre- and post-procedural ultrasound exams to predict the clinical outcome after endovascular revascularisations. Methods: In this prospective, single-centre, service evaluation, consecutive patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease undergoing lower limb endovascular revascularisations between July, 26 2018 and January, 13 2022 at Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust (Redhill, UK) were analysed. eABPI was determined using the higher acceleration index measured with angle-corrected duplex ultrasound in ankle arteries before and ≤1 month post-procedure. Clinical outcomes (mortality, major amputations, amputation-free survival [AFS], clinically driven target lesion revascularization [cdTLR], major adverse limb events [MALE; cdTLR and major amputation], wound healing) were assessed over 1 year. Findings: Of 246 patients treated, for 219 patients (median 75 [IQR 66-83] years) pre- and post-procedural eABPI (0.50 [0.33-0.59] and 0.90 [0.69-1.0], Interpretation: Post-procedural eABPI can provide valid, clinically important prognostic and predictive information. Our data indicate that revascularisations should target values of at least 0.9 to achieve optimal outcomes. Future studies need to confirm generalisability and cost-effectiveness in a wider context. Funding: European Partnership on Metrology, co-financed from European Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Programme and UK Research and Innovation.

Indexed as

AngioplastyBiomarkerChronic limb-threatening ischaemiaEstimated ankle brachial pressure indexPeripheral artery disease

Identifiers

PMID38273891
PMCPMC10809069
OpenAlexW4390599052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.