ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024
Efficacy of e-health interventions for smoking cessation management in smokers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prognostic value of the prognostic nutritional index for patients with renal cell carcinoma: an update systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Association between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the prognosis of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Association between prognostic nutritional index and prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Prognostic value of prognostic nutritional index in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Association between serum lipid levels and the risk of diabetic nephropathy: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of digital interventions for smoking cessation by type and method: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Nature human behaviour · 2025Pooled it
- Prognostic nutritional index and survival in prostate cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Interventions in the workplace to reduce risk factors for noncommunicable diseases: an umbrella review of systematic reviews of effectiveness.Journal of occupational health · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and long-term engagement of a WeChat-integrated modality versus a traditional quitline on smoking cessation in China: a randomised controlled trial.BMC medicine · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Reinforcement learning for proposing smoking cessation activities that build competencies: Combining two worldviews in a virtual coach.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Trial
- #EnufSnuff.TXT-FirstResponder: a pilot randomized controlled trial of a text message intervention for smokeless tobacco cessation among First Responders.Frontiers in public health · 2025Trial
- Association between systemic inflammatory response index and the prognosis of patients with localized and advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Exploring the capacity of smoking cessation services in the Philippines.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2026Article
- Examining rural disparities in cigarette smoking among U.S. women by chronological age: 2002-2022.Preventive medicine · 2025Article
- Expert Review of the Strategies to Optimize Long-Term Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.Thoracic research and practice · 2025Article
- Personalized digital tools boost smoking quit rates.Nature human behaviour · 2025Article
- Effectiveness and Adherence of Standalone Digital Tobacco Cessation Modalities: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Prevalence, trends and outcomes from smoking in elective surgical systems: a secondary analysis of a prospective observational cohort study across 442 hospitals from 29 countries across Europe.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Smoking is one of the major risk factors for shortened lifespan and disability, while smoking cessation is currently the only guaranteed method to reduce the harm caused by smoking. E-health is a field that utilizes information and communication technology to support the health status of its users. The emergence of this digital health approach has provided a new way of smoking cessation support for smokers seeking help, and an increasing number of researchers are attempting to use e-health for a wide range of effective smoking cessation interventions. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that used e-health as a smoking cessation support tool. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases until December 2022. The included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of e-health interventions and traditional offline smoking cessation care interventions. The primary outcome of the studies was the point smoking cessation rate (7-day and 30-day), and the secondary outcome was sustained smoking cessation rates. Studies were excluded if there was no clear e-health intervention described or if standard-compliant cessation outcomes were not clearly reported. Fixed-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression analyses were performed on the included study data to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions. The meta-analysis outcome was the risk ratio (RR) and a 95% confidence interval. The study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023388667. Findings: We collectively screened 2408 articles, and ultimately included 39 articles with a total of 17,351 eligible participants, of which 44 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that compared to traditional smoking cessation interventions, e-health interventions can increase point quit rates (RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.69-2.04) as well as sustained quit rates in the long-term (RR 1.79, 95% CI 1.60-2.00) among smokers. Subgroup analysis showed that text and telephone interventions in e-health significantly improved short-term quit rates for up to 7 days (RR 2.10, 95% CI 1.77-2.48). Website and app interventions also had a positive impact on improving short-term quit rates for up to 7 days (RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.56-1.94). The heterogeneity of the study results was low, demonstrating the significant smoking cessation advantages of e-health interventions. Interpretation: We have found that personalized e-health interventions can effectively help smokers quit smoking. The diverse remote intervention methods of e-health can provide more convenient options for further customization. Additionally, further follow-up research is needed to evaluate the sustained effectiveness of interventions on smokers' continuous abstinence over a longer period (greater than one year). In the future, e-health can further optimize smoking cessation strategies. Funding: No funding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.