Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38273888›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Identification and validation of an explainable prediction model of acute kidney injury with prognostic implications in critically ill children: a prospective multicenter cohort study.

Junlong Hu, Jing Xu, Min Li, Zhen Jiang, Jie Mao, Lian Feng, Kexin Miao, Huiwen Li, Jiao Chen, Zhenjiang Bai and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 143 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
143citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
58.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

143 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 172 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

83 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Junlong HuDepartment of Nephrology and Immunology, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu province, China.
Jing XuDepartment of Nephrology and Immunology, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu province, China.
Min LiPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Anhui Provincial Children's Hospital, Hefei, Anhui province, China.
Zhen JiangPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Xuzhou Children's Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu province, China.
Jie MaoDepartment of Nephrology and Immunology, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu province, China.
Lian FengDepartment of Nephrology and Immunology, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu province, China.
Kexin MiaoDepartment of Nephrology and Immunology, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu province, China.
Huiwen LiDepartment of Nephrology and Immunology, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu province, China.
Jiao ChenPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu province, China.
Zhenjiang BaiPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu province, China.
Xiaozhong LiDepartment of Nephrology and Immunology, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu province, China.
Guoping LuPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yanhong LiDepartment of Nephrology and Immunology, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu province, China.
Soochow University · CNAnhui Provincial Children's Hospital · CNChildren's Hospital of Fudan University · CNXuzhou Children Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and serious organ dysfunction in critically ill children. Early identification and prediction of AKI are of great significance. However, current AKI criteria are insufficiently sensitive and specific, and AKI heterogeneity limits the clinical value of AKI biomarkers. This study aimed to establish and validate an explainable prediction model based on the machine learning (ML) approach for AKI, and assess its prognostic implications in children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Methods: This multicenter prospective study in China was conducted on critically ill children for the derivation and validation of the prediction model. The derivation cohort, consisting of 957 children admitted to four independent PICUs from September 2020 to January 2021, was separated for training and internal validation, and an external data set of 866 children admitted from February 2021 to February 2022 was employed for external validation. AKI was defined based on serum creatinine and urine output using the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) criteria. With 33 medical characteristics easily obtained or evaluated during the first 24 h after PICU admission, 11 ML algorithms were used to construct prediction models. Several evaluation indexes, including the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC), were used to compare the predictive performance. The SHapley Additive exPlanation method was used to rank the feature importance and explain the final model. A probability threshold for the final model was identified for AKI prediction and subgrouping. Clinical outcomes were evaluated in various subgroups determined by a combination of the final model and KDIGO criteria. Findings: The random forest (RF) model performed best in discriminative ability among the 11 ML models. After reducing features according to feature importance rank, an explainable final RF model was established with 8 features. The final model could accurately predict AKI in both internal (AUC = 0.929) and external (AUC = 0.910) validations, and has been translated into a convenient tool to facilitate its utility in clinical settings. Critically ill children with a probability exceeding or equal to the threshold in the final model had a higher risk of death and multiple organ dysfunctions, regardless of whether they met the KDIGO criteria for AKI. Interpretation: Our explainable ML model was not only successfully developed to accurately predict AKI but was also highly relevant to adverse outcomes in individual children at an early stage of PICU admission, and it mitigated the concern of the "black-box" issue with an undirect interpretation of the ML technique. Funding: The National Natural Science Foundation of China, Jiangsu Province Science and Technology Support Program, Key talent of women's and children's health of Jiangsu Province, and Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province.

Indexed as

Acute kidney injuryAdverse outcomeCritically ill childrenMachine learningPrediction modelSHAP

Identifiers

PMID38273888
PMCPMC10809096
OpenAlexW4390599059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.