ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Identification and validation of a prognostic risk-scoring model for AML based on m
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Review
- Unveiling the role of coagulation-related genes in acute myeloid leukemia prognosis and immune microenvironment through machine learning.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Research on RNA modification in disease diagnosis and prognostic biomarkers: current status and challenges.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Integration of 101 machine learning algorithm combinations to unveil m6A/m1A/m5C/m7G-associated prognostic signature in colorectal cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients still suffer from poor 5-year survival and relapse after remission. A better prognostic assessment tool is urgently needed. New evidence demonstrates that 7-methylguanosine (m7G) methylation modifications play an important role in AML, however, the exact role of m7G-related genes in the prognosis of AML remains unclear. Methods: The study obtained AML expression profiles and clinical information from TCGA, GEO, and TARGET databases. Using the patient data from the TCGA cohort as the training set. Consensus clustering was performed based on 29 m7G-related genes. Survival analysis was performed by KM curves. The subgroup characteristic gene sets were screened using WGCNA. And tumor immune infiltration correlation analysis was performed by ssGSEA. Results: The patients were classified into 3 groups based on m7G-related genebased cluster analysis, and the differential genes were screened by differential analysis and WGCNA. After LASSO regression analysis, 6 characteristic genes (including CBR1, CCDC102A, LGALS1, RD3L, SLC29A2, and TWIST1) were screened, and a prognostic risk-score model was constructed. The survival rate of low-risk patients was significantly higher than that of high-risk patients (p < 0.0001). The area under the curve values at 1, 3, and 5 years in the training set were 0.871, 0.874, and 0.951, respectively, indicating that this predictive model has an excellent predictive effect. In addition, after univariate and multivariate Cox regression screening, histograms were constructed with clinical characteristics and prognostic risk score models to better predict individual survival. Further analysis showed that the prognostic risk score model was associated with immune cell infiltration. Conclusion: These findings suggest that the scoring model and essential risk genes could provide potential prognostic biomarkers for patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.