Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38273718›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2024

SAND: Automated Time-Domain Modeling of NMR Spectra Applied to Metabolite Quantification.

Yue Wu, Omid Sanati, Mario Uchimiya, Krish Krishnamurthy, Jonathan Wedell, Jeffrey C Hoch, Arthur S Edison, Frank Delaglio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Metabolite Fraction Libraries for Quantitative NMR Metabolomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Automatic fitting of multiple-field solid-state NMR spectra.Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance · 2024
    Article
  9. NMR-based metabolomics: Where are we now and where are we going?Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yue WuInstitute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, United States.
Omid SanatiSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, United States.
Mario UchimiyaComplex Carbohydrate Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, United States.
Krish KrishnamurthyChempacker LLC, San Jose, California 95135, United States.
Jonathan WedellNational Magnetic Resonance Facility, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
Jeffrey C HochDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut 06030-3305, United States.
Arthur S EdisonInstitute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5686-2350
Frank DelaglioInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, National Institute of Standards and Technology and the University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1264-2556

Funding

TRD3 NMRbox: Bayesian AnalyticsP41GM111135 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI HOCH, JEFFREY C · 2015 to 2024
$14.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM111135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developments in untargeted nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) metabolomics enable the profiling of thousands of biological samples. The exploitation of this rich source of information requires a detailed quantification of spectral features. However, the development of a consistent and automatic workflow has been challenging because of extensive signal overlap. To address this challenge, we introduce the software Spectral Automated NMR Decomposition (SAND). SAND follows on from the previous success of time-domain modeling and automatically quantifies entire spectra without manual interaction. The SAND approach uses hybrid optimization with Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, employing subsampling in both time and frequency domains. In particular, SAND randomly divides the time-domain data into training and validation sets to help avoid overfitting. We demonstrate the accuracy of SAND, which provides a correlation of ∼0.9 with ground truth on cases including highly overlapped simulated data sets, a two-compound mixture, and a urine sample spiked with different amounts of a four-compound mixture. We further demonstrate an automated annotation using correlation networks derived from SAND decomposed peaks, and on average, 74% of peaks for each compound can be recovered in single clusters. SAND is available in NMRbox, the cloud computing environment for NMR software hosted by the Network for Advanced NMR (NAN). Since the SAND method uses time-domain subsampling (i.e., random subset of time-domain points), it has the potential to be extended to a higher dimensionality and nonuniformly sampled data.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMetabolomicsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID38273718
PMCPMC10896553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.