ArticleAnalytical chemistry2024
SAND: Automated Time-Domain Modeling of NMR Spectra Applied to Metabolite Quantification.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Metabolomics and metabolites in cancer diagnosis and treatment.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Pooled it
- Metabolite Fraction Libraries for Quantitative NMR Metabolomics.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Simulating the extraction of signal parameters and spectrograms for non-stationary NMR signals.Magnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany) · 2026Article
- Metabolite Fraction Libraries for Quantitative NMR Metabolomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Securing the Future of NMR Metabolomics Reproducibility: A Call for Standardized Reporting.Analytical chemistry · 2025Review
- The prowess of metabolomics in cancer research: current trends, challenges and future perspectives.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2025Review
- Article
- Automatic fitting of multiple-field solid-state NMR spectra.Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance · 2024Article
- NMR-based metabolomics: Where are we now and where are we going?Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Developments in untargeted nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) metabolomics enable the profiling of thousands of biological samples. The exploitation of this rich source of information requires a detailed quantification of spectral features. However, the development of a consistent and automatic workflow has been challenging because of extensive signal overlap. To address this challenge, we introduce the software Spectral Automated NMR Decomposition (SAND). SAND follows on from the previous success of time-domain modeling and automatically quantifies entire spectra without manual interaction. The SAND approach uses hybrid optimization with Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, employing subsampling in both time and frequency domains. In particular, SAND randomly divides the time-domain data into training and validation sets to help avoid overfitting. We demonstrate the accuracy of SAND, which provides a correlation of ∼0.9 with ground truth on cases including highly overlapped simulated data sets, a two-compound mixture, and a urine sample spiked with different amounts of a four-compound mixture. We further demonstrate an automated annotation using correlation networks derived from SAND decomposed peaks, and on average, 74% of peaks for each compound can be recovered in single clusters. SAND is available in NMRbox, the cloud computing environment for NMR software hosted by the Network for Advanced NMR (NAN). Since the SAND method uses time-domain subsampling (i.e., random subset of time-domain points), it has the potential to be extended to a higher dimensionality and nonuniformly sampled data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.