ReviewThe British journal of radiology2024
Radiochromic film dosimetry in radiotherapy: a survey of current practice in the United Kingdom.
Review in The British journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- FilmQADose: Open-source software for radiochromic film dosimetry.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- An international film dosimetry intercomparison to establish a multi-center audit framework.Medical physics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo establish the variation in film dosimetry usage in radiotherapy centres across the United Kingdom. To identify consensus and highlight areas of potential improvement to enhance radiotherapy dosimetry verification with film.
methodsA survey questionnaire was designed by members of the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine Interdepartmental Dosimetry Audit Group via Microsoft Forms and distributed to all Heads of Radiotherapy Physics in the United Kingdom. The survey was open from June 19, 2023, to July 31, 2023.
resultsForty responses were received from the 62 radiotherapy centres in the United Kingdom, of which 58% were currently using film dosimetry and a further 7 were keen to commence use. Many reported film use had decreased in recent years but was still valuable particularly for commissioning and implementing new techniques. The variation and consensus of methods for film dosimetry calibration, measurement, and application was established. A review of barriers to implementation and methods to reduce uncertainty were included in the assessment.
conclusionsA comprehensive assessment of film dosimetry usage in radiotherapy in the United Kingdom has been collated, which demonstrates a wide variation in methods, across typical clinical users, but maintains film as a valuable dosimetry option. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This research provides a snapshot of current film dosimetry use across the United Kingdom. It examines the variation and consensus of practice to which individual users can compare their systems, and identifies opportunities to improvement in the accuracy of film dosimetry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.