Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38273418›Full record

ArticleCancer & metabolism2024

Systemic inflammation and insulin resistance-related indicator predicts poor outcome in patients with cancer cachexia.

Guo-Tian Ruan, Li Deng, Hai-Lun Xie, Jin-Yu Shi, Xiao-Yue Liu, Xin Zheng, Yue Chen, Shi-Qi Lin, He-Yang Zhang, Chen-An Liu and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer & metabolism, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cancer-Associated Cachexia in the Era of Obesity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Guo-Tian Ruan *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery/Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 10 Tie Yi Road, Beijing, 100038, China.
Li Deng *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery/Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 10 Tie Yi Road, Beijing, 100038, China.
Hai-Lun XieDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery/Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 10 Tie Yi Road, Beijing, 100038, China.
Jin-Yu ShiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery/Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 10 Tie Yi Road, Beijing, 100038, China.
Xiao-Yue LiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery/Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 10 Tie Yi Road, Beijing, 100038, China.
Xin ZhengDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery/Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 10 Tie Yi Road, Beijing, 100038, China.
Yue ChenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery/Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 10 Tie Yi Road, Beijing, 100038, China.
Shi-Qi LinDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery/Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 10 Tie Yi Road, Beijing, 100038, China.
He-Yang ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery/Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 10 Tie Yi Road, Beijing, 100038, China.
Chen-An LiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery/Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 10 Tie Yi Road, Beijing, 100038, China.
Yi-Zhong GeDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery/Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 10 Tie Yi Road, Beijing, 100038, China.
Meng-Meng SongDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery/Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 10 Tie Yi Road, Beijing, 100038, China.
Chun-Lei HuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery/Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 10 Tie Yi Road, Beijing, 100038, China.
Xiao-Wei ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery/Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 10 Tie Yi Road, Beijing, 100038, China.
Ming YangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery/Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 10 Tie Yi Road, Beijing, 100038, China.
Wen HuClinical Nutrition Department, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Ming-Hua CongComprehensive Oncology Department, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100038, China.
Li-Chen ZhuDepartment of Immunology, School of Preclinical Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, China.
Kun-Hua WangYunnan University, Kunming, 650091, China.
Han-Ping ShiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery/Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 10 Tie Yi Road, Beijing, 100038, China. shihp@ccmu.edu.cn.
Beijing Shijitan Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNGuangxi Medical University · CNNational Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases · CNSichuan University · CNYunnan University · CN

Funding

Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission SCW2018-06National Key Research and Development Program of China 2017YFC1309200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe C-reactive protein (CRP)-triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index (CTI), which is a measure representing the level of inflammation and insulin resistance (IR), is related to poor cancer prognosis; however, the CTI has not been validated in patients with cancer cachexia. Thus, this study aimed to explore the potential clinical value of the CTI in patients with cancer cachexia.

methodsIn this study, our prospective multicenter cohort included 1411 patients with cancer cachexia (mean age 59.45 ± 11.38, 63.3% male), which was a combined analysis of multiple cancer types. We randomly selected 30% of the patients for the internal test cohort (mean age 58.90 ± 11.22% 61.4% male). Additionally, we included 307 patients with cancer cachexia in the external validation cohort (mean age 61.16 ± 11, 58.5% male). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration curves were performed to investigate the prognostic value of CTI. The prognostic value of the CTI was also investigated performing univariate and multivariate survival analyses.

resultsThe survival curve indicated that the CTI showed a significant prognostic value in the total, internal, and external validation cohorts. Prognostic ROC curves and calibration curves revealed that the CTI showed good consistency in predicting the survival of patients with cancer cachexia. Multivariate survival analysis showed that an elevated CTI increased the risk of death by 22% (total cohort, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13-1.33), 34% (internal test cohort, 95%CI = 1.11-1.62), and 35% (external validation cohort, 95%CI = 1.14-1.59) for each increase in the standard deviation of CTI. High CTI reliably predicted shorter survival (total cohort, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.45, 95%CI = 1.22-1.71; internal test cohort, HR = 1.62, 95%CI = 1.12-2.36; external validation cohort, HR = 1.61, 95%CI = 1.15-2.26). High CTI significantly predicted shorter survival in different tumor subgroups, such as esophageal [HR = 2.11, 95%CI = 1.05-4.21] and colorectal cancer [HR = 2.29, 95%CI = 1.42-3.71]. The mediating effects analysis found that the mediating proportions of PGSGA, ECOG PS, and EORTC QLQ-C30 on the direct effects of CTI were 21.72%, 19.63%, and 11.61%, respectively We found that there was a significant positive correlation between the CTI and 90-day [HR = 2.48, 95%CI = 1.52-4.14] and 180-day mortality [HR = 1.77,95%CI = 1.24-2.55] in patients with cancer cachexia.

conclusionThe CTI can predict the short- and long-term survival of patients with cancer cachexia and provide a useful prognostic tool for clinical practice.

Indexed as

CTIInsulin resistanceOverall survivalSystemic inflammation

Identifiers

PMID38273418
PMCPMC10809764
OpenAlexW4391224537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.