Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38273317›Full record

SynthesisHuman resources for health2024

Impacts for health and care workers of Covid-19 and other public health emergencies of international concern: living systematic review, meta-analysis and policy recommendations.

Inês Fronteira, Verona Mathews, Ranailla Lima Bandeira Dos Santos, Karen Matsumoto, Woldekidan Amde, Alessandra Pereira, Ana Paula Cavalcante de Oliveira, Isabel Craveiro, Raphael Chança, Mathieu Boniol and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human resources for health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Patients and staff perspectives on hospital ward strain and its impacts on patient care and the workforce: a mixed-methods systematic review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Analyses of haplotypes ofFrontiers in genetics · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Inês FronteiraGlobal Health and Tropical Medicine, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Rua da Junqueira, 100, 1349-008, Lisbon, Portugal. ines.fronteira@ensp.unl.pt.ORCID 0000-0003-1406-4585
Verona MathewsSchool of Public, Health University of the Western Cape, South Africa, Private Bag X17, Bellville, 7535, Republic of South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-5944-9169
Ranailla Lima Bandeira Dos SantosEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sérgio Arouca, Fundação Osvaldo Cruz, Rua Leopoldo Bulhões, 1480 - Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9048-9369
Karen MatsumotoInstituto de Medicina Social, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rua São Francisco Xavier 524 - 7º andar, Blocos D e E - Maracanã, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 20550-013, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9460-6334
Woldekidan AmdeSchool of Public, Health University of the Western Cape, South Africa, Private Bag X17, Bellville, 7535, Republic of South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-0511-4096
Alessandra PereiraInstituto de Medicina Social, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rua São Francisco Xavier 524 - 7º andar, Blocos D e E - Maracanã, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 20550-013, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8730-889X
Ana Paula Cavalcante de OliveiraInstituto de Medicina Social, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rua São Francisco Xavier 524 - 7º andar, Blocos D e E - Maracanã, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 20550-013, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0654-1417
Isabel CraveiroGlobal Health and Tropical Medicine, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Rua da Junqueira, 100, 1349-008, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4348-1986
Raphael ChançaInstituto Nacional de Cancer, Ministério da Saúde, Rua Marquês de Pombal, 125, Centro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 20230240, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1023-245X
Mathieu BoniolHealth Workforce Department, World Health Organization, Av. Appia 20, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1052-5604
Paulo Ferrinho *Global Health and Tropical Medicine, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Rua da Junqueira, 100, 1349-008, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3722-0803
Mario Roberto Dal Poz *Instituto de Medicina Social, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rua São Francisco Xavier 524 - 7º andar, Blocos D e E - Maracanã, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 20550-013, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3005-3280
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PTUniversity of the Western Cape · ZAEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública · BRMinistério da Saúde · BRNational School of Public Health · GRWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth and care workers (HCW) faced the double burden of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: as members of a society affected by a public health emergency and as HWC who experienced fear of becoming infected and of infecting others, stigma, violence, increased workloads, changes in scope of practice, among others. To understand the short and long-term impacts in terms of the COVID-19 pandemic and other public health emergencies of international concern (PHEICs) on HCW and relevant interventions to address them, we designed and conducted a living systematic review (LSR).

methodsWe reviewed literature retrieved from MEDLINE-PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS, LILACS, the World Health Organization COVID-19 database, the ClinicalTrials.org and the ILO database, published from January 2000 until December 2021. We included quantitative observational studies, experimental studies, quasi-experimental, mixed methods or qualitative studies; addressing mental, physical health and well-being and quality of life. The review targeted HCW; and interventions and exposures, implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic or other PHEICs. To assess the risk of bias of included studies, we used the Johanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tools. Data were qualitatively synthetized using meta-aggregation and meta-analysis was performed to estimate pooled prevalence of some of the outcomes.

resultsThe 1013 studies included in the review were mainly quantitative research, cross-sectional, with medium risk of bias/quality, addressing at least one of the following: mental health issue, violence, physical health and well-being, and quality of life. Additionally, interventions to address short- and long-term impact of PHEICs on HCW included in the review, although scarce, were mainly behavioral and individual oriented, aimed at improving mental health through the development of individual interventions. A lack of interventions addressing organizational or systemic bottlenecks was noted. DISCUSSION: PHEICs impacted the mental and physical health of HCW with the greatest toll on mental health. The impact PHEICs are intricate and complex. The review revealed the consequences for health and care service delivery, with increased unplanned absenteeism, service disruption and occupation turnover that subvert the capacity to answer to the PHEICs, specifically challenging the resilience of health systems.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesEmergenciesHumansPandemicsPolicyPublic HealthQuality of LifeSARS-CoV-2COVID-19EbolaHealth and care workersInfluenzaLiving systematic reviewMental health physical healthMERSMeta-analysisPublic health emergencies of international concernSARSSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID38273317
PMCPMC10809470
OpenAlexW4391221686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.