Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38273306›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2024

Are the European reference networks for rare diseases ready to embrace machine learning? A mixed-methods study.

Georgi Iskrov, Ralitsa Raycheva, Kostadin Kostadinov, Sandra Gillner, Carl Rudolf Blankart, Edith Sky Gross, Gulcin Gumus, Elena Mitova, Stefan Stefanov, Georgi Stefanov and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Georgi IskrovInstitute for Rare Diseases, 22 Maestro G. Atanasov St., 4017, Plovdiv, Bulgaria. georgi.g.iskrov@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0988-0062
Ralitsa RaychevaInstitute for Rare Diseases, 22 Maestro G. Atanasov St., 4017, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Kostadin KostadinovInstitute for Rare Diseases, 22 Maestro G. Atanasov St., 4017, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Sandra GillnerKPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Freiburgstr. 3, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Carl Rudolf BlankartKPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Freiburgstr. 3, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Edith Sky GrossEURORDIS - Rare Diseases Europe, 96 Rue Didot, 75014, Paris, France.
Gulcin GumusEURORDIS - Rare Diseases Europe, 96 Rue Didot, 75014, Paris, France.
Elena MitovaInstitute for Rare Diseases, 22 Maestro G. Atanasov St., 4017, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Stefan StefanovInstitute for Rare Diseases, 22 Maestro G. Atanasov St., 4017, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Georgi StefanovInstitute for Rare Diseases, 22 Maestro G. Atanasov St., 4017, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Rumen StefanovInstitute for Rare Diseases, 22 Maestro G. Atanasov St., 4017, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.

Funding

Innovative Medicines Initiative 101034427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe delay in diagnosis for rare disease (RD) patients is often longer than for patients with common diseases. Machine learning (ML) technologies have the potential to speed up and increase the precision of diagnosis in this population group. We aim to explore the expectations and experiences of the members of the European Reference Networks (ERNs) for RDs with those technologies and their potential for application.

methodsWe used a mixed-methods approach with an online survey followed by a focus group discussion. Our study targeted primarily medical professionals but also other individuals affiliated with any of the 24 ERNs.

resultsThe online survey yielded 423 responses from ERN members. Participants reported a limited degree of knowledge of and experience with ML technologies. They considered improved diagnostic accuracy the most important potential benefit, closely followed by the synthesis of clinical information, and indicated the lack of training in these new technologies, which hinders adoption and implementation in routine care. Most respondents supported the option that ML should be an optional but recommended part of the diagnostic process for RDs. Most ERN members saw the use of ML limited to specialised units only in the next 5 years, where those technologies should be funded by public sources. Focus group discussions concluded that the potential of ML technologies is substantial and confirmed that the technologies will have an important impact on healthcare and RDs in particular. As ML technologies are not the core competency of health care professionals, participants deemed a close collaboration with developers necessary to ensure that results are valid and reliable. However, based on our results, we call for more research to understand other stakeholders' opinions and expectations, including the views of patient organisations.

conclusionsWe found enthusiasm to implement and apply ML technologies, especially diagnostic tools in the field of RDs, despite the perceived lack of experience. Early dialogue and collaboration between health care professionals, developers, industry, policymakers, and patient associations seem to be crucial to building trust, improving performance, and ultimately increasing the willingness to accept diagnostics based on ML technologies.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareRare DiseasesFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansMachine LearningArtificial intelligenceDiagnosisDiagnostic delayEuropean reference networksMachine learningRare diseases

Identifiers

PMID38273306
PMCPMC10809751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.