Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38273297›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2024

Dialysis decision-making process by Chinese American patients at an urban, academic medical center: a retrospective chart review.

Abigail L Lebovitz, Steven A Schwab, Michelle M Richardson, Klemens B Meyer, Benjamin Sweigart, Tamara Vesel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Abigail L LebovitzTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Steven A SchwabTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Michelle M RichardsonTufts Medical Center, Department of Medicine, William B. Schwartz Division of Nephrology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Dialysis Clinic, Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
Klemens B MeyerTufts Medical Center, Department of Medicine, William B. Schwartz Division of Nephrology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Dialysis Clinic, Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
Benjamin SweigartTufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Tamara VeselTufts Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, Tufts University School of Medicine, 800 Washington Street, Boston, MA, 02111, USA. tamara.vesel@tuftsmedicine.org.
Tufts University · USTufts Medical Center · USSouthern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute · US

Funding

CTSA Predoctoral T32 at Tufts UniversityT32TR004417 · NCATS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI DAVID M KENT · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
NCATS NIH HHS T32 TR004417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical practice guidelines emphasize shared decision-making for kidney replacement treatment, yet little is known about the influence of cultural differences on that process. We undertook a retrospective chart review to explore the process and timing of dialysis decision making and initiation in Chinese American patients to provide quality kidney care for this population.

designParticipants received outpatient care at Tufts Medical Center and dialysis at Dialysis Clinic, Inc. Boston or Somerville, MA from 2001-2021. Clinic chart review sourced demographic, clinical, and end-of-life care information from 180 participants (82 Chinese American, 98 other) from stage 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) and dialysis initiation.

resultsChinese American participants were older (mean 70 vs. 59, p < 0.0001), less likely to speak English (12% vs. 87%, p < 0.0001), and used interpreter services more (80% vs. 11%, p < 0.0001). Chinese American participants had more visits (median 14 vs. 10, p = 0.005); were more often accompanied by family members (75% vs. 40%, p < 0.001); and had significantly lower rates of healthcare proxy documentation (35% vs. 55%, p = 0.006). There was no statistical difference in months between first CKD 4 visit and first dialysis. Both groups started dialysis at the same average eGFR and with similar rates of permanent dialysis access. Chinese American participants had significantly lower serum albumin at dialysis initiation (mean 3.3 g/dL vs 3.7 g/dL, p = 0.0003). Documentation reflected a low number of conversations about non-dialytic care, end-of-life planning, or palliative care in both groups across all visits.

conclusionThe time between CKD 4 and dialysis initiation was the same in both groups, suggesting a similar overall outcome of care. Chart documentation suggests that Chinese American participants had a significantly higher number of visits with nephrologists where discussion about dialysis was noted and were more likely to have a family member present at the visit. Fewer Chinese American participants completed healthcare proxies. Among all study participants, healthcare proxy, code status, and palliative care discussions were reported less frequently than expected. These findings highlight opportunities for collaboration between palliative care clinicians and nephrologists.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingKidney Failure, ChronicRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAsianHumansRenal DialysisRetrospective StudiesChart reviewChinese AmericanChronic kidney diseaseDecision-makingKidney failure

Identifiers

PMID38273297
PMCPMC10809624
OpenAlexW4391229064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.