ArticleBMC oral health2024
Delayed vs. immediate placement of restorative materials over Biodentine and RetroMTA: a micro-shear bond strength study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the cytotoxicity and efficacy of nanoemulsion containing propolis plus Nigella sativa nanoparticles for pulpotomy of primary teeth: randomised split-mouth clinical trial pilot study.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2025Trial
- Adhesive Bonding to Hydraulic Gel-Forming Calcium Silicate-Based Cements: Effects of Cement Type, Adhesive Strategy, and Restoration Timing.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effect of external cervical resorptive defects restored with two bioceramic materials, short glass fiber-reinforced composite and nanohybrid composite on fracture resistance of maxillary anterior teeth: an in-vitro study.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Effects of adhesive application timing on the push-out bond strength of four calcium silicate-based cements: a comparative study in vitro.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Faster-setting calcium silicate cements-composite bonding: effect of adhesive application mode.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- The effect of residual root length and different root canal filling materials on biomechanical stress distribution following apical resection: a finite element analysis study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Effect of maturation time and adhesive system on the shear bond strength and failure modes of Biodentine™ bonded with resin composite and glass ionomer cement.Biomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2026Article
- Vital pulp therapy using Biodentine XP and adhesive restorations: a three-year case series.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- Temporal effects of restorative pretreatments on Biodentine: an in-vitro study.Biomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2026Article
- Shear Bond Strength of Biointeractive Restorative Materials to NeoMTA Plus and Biodentine.Polymers · 2025Article
- Do Restorative Strategies and Delayed Restoration Improve the Bond Strength to Biodentine? In Vitro Study on Adhesive Restorations on a Calcium Silicate-Based Cement.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2025Article
- Effect of Indirect Pulp Capping Materials On Regional Dentin Seal.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2025Article
- Article
- Evaluation of the Effect of Chitosan-Based Irrigation Solutions on the Bond Strength of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate to Bulk-Fill Composite.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
- Immediate and delayed shear bond strength evaluation between root canal sealers and restorative materials: an experimental study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of the present study was to investigate the micro-shear bond strength (µSBS) of various restorative materials applied on two different fast-setting calcium silicate-based materials and to evaluate the effect of restoration time on µSBS.
methodsA total of 180 acrylic blocks with a cavity in the center were randomly divided into 2 main groups according to the capping material to be used (Biodentine or RetroMTA). The specimens were also randomly divided into 3 groups according to the restoration time (3 min, 12 min, 24 h). After the specified waiting periods, glass hybrid material (EQUIA Forte HT), resin composite (Filtek Z550) and light-cured calcium silicate material (Theracal LC) were placed on the specimens with tygon tubes. The specimens were kept for 24 h and then subjected to µSBS test. Statistical analysis was performed by 3-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test for pairwise comparisons (α = 0.05).
resultsThere is a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between the µSBS values obtained by applying resin composite on RetroMTA after different setting times (24 h > 12 min > 3 min). The µSBS obtained for the Biodentine-resin composite at the end of the 3 min setting time is significantly lower (p < 0.05) than the µSBS values at 12 min and 24 h. For both calcium silicate cements, at the end of all time periods, the µSBS obtained when resin composite was applied at the end was higher than the other materials (p < 0.05).
conclusionsFor Biodentine-resin composite bonding, the manufacturer's recommendation of 12 min can be considered an appropriate time, whereas for RetroMTA-resin composite bonding, the µSBS increased as the waiting time increased. Regardless of the waiting time, it is recommended to prefer direct composite resin restoration over Biodentine and RetroMTA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.