Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38273288›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2024

Quantifying the proportion of different cell types in the human cortex using DNA methylation profiles.

Eilis Hannon, Emma L Dempster, Jonathan P Davies, Barry Chioza, Georgina E T Blake, Joe Burrage, Stefania Policicchio, Alice Franklin, Emma M Walker, Rosemary A Bamford and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Eilis HannonDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Barrack Road, RILD Building, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Barrack Road, Exeter, Devon, EX2 5DW, UK. E.J.Hannon@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6840-072X
Emma L DempsterDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Barrack Road, RILD Building, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Barrack Road, Exeter, Devon, EX2 5DW, UK.
Jonathan P DaviesDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Barrack Road, RILD Building, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Barrack Road, Exeter, Devon, EX2 5DW, UK.
Barry ChiozaDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Barrack Road, RILD Building, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Barrack Road, Exeter, Devon, EX2 5DW, UK.
Georgina E T BlakeDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Barrack Road, RILD Building, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Barrack Road, Exeter, Devon, EX2 5DW, UK.
Joe BurrageDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Barrack Road, RILD Building, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Barrack Road, Exeter, Devon, EX2 5DW, UK.
Stefania PolicicchioItalian Institute of Technology, Center for Human Technologies (CHT), Genova, Italy.
Alice FranklinDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Barrack Road, RILD Building, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Barrack Road, Exeter, Devon, EX2 5DW, UK.
Emma M WalkerDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Barrack Road, RILD Building, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Barrack Road, Exeter, Devon, EX2 5DW, UK.
Rosemary A BamfordDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Barrack Road, RILD Building, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Barrack Road, Exeter, Devon, EX2 5DW, UK.
Leonard C SchalkwykSchool of Life Sciences, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, Essex, CO4 3SQ, UK.
Jonathan MillDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Barrack Road, RILD Building, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Barrack Road, Exeter, Devon, EX2 5DW, UK.
University of Exeter · GBItalian Institute of Technology · ITUniversity of Essex · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council K013807Medical Research Council M008924Medical Research Council MR/W004984/1Medical Research Council W004984
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to interindividual variation in the cellular composition of the human cortex, it is essential that covariates that capture these differences are included in epigenome-wide association studies using bulk tissue. As experimentally derived cell counts are often unavailable, computational solutions have been adopted to estimate the proportion of different cell types using DNA methylation data. Here, we validate and profile the use of an expanded reference DNA methylation dataset incorporating two neuronal and three glial cell subtypes for quantifying the cellular composition of the human cortex.

resultsWe tested eight reference panels containing different combinations of neuronal- and glial cell types and characterised their performance in deconvoluting cell proportions from computationally reconstructed or empirically derived human cortex DNA methylation data. Our analyses demonstrate that while these novel brain deconvolution models produce accurate estimates of cellular proportions from profiles generated on postnatal human cortex samples, they are not appropriate for the use in prenatal cortex or cerebellum tissue samples. Applying our models to an extensive collection of empirical datasets, we show that glial cells are twice as abundant as neuronal cells in the human cortex and identify significant associations between increased Alzheimer's disease neuropathology and the proportion of specific cell types including a decrease in NeuNNeg/SOX10Neg nuclei and an increase of NeuNNeg/SOX10Pos nuclei.

conclusionsOur novel deconvolution models produce accurate estimates for cell proportions in the human cortex. These models are available as a resource to the community enabling the control of cellular heterogeneity in epigenetic studies of brain disorders performed on bulk cortex tissue.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticCerebral CortexFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornNeurogliaNeuronsPregnancyAlzheimer’s diseaseBrainCellular heterogeneityDNA methylationGliaNeurons

Identifiers

PMID38273288
PMCPMC10809680
OpenAlexW4391226689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.