Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38273282›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2024

Creating allies: qualitative exploration of young women's preferences for PrEP methods and parents' role in PrEP uptake and user support in urban and rural Zambia.

Christina Misa Wong, Tendai Munthali, Featherstone G Mangunje, Mercy L Katoka, Holly M Burke, Bupe Musonda, Musonda Musonda, Catherine S Todd

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christina Misa WongGlobal Health & Population, FHI 360, 359 Blackwell Street, Suite 200, Durham, NC, 27701, USA. cwong@fhi360.org.
Tendai MunthaliMinistry of Health, Government of the Republic of Zambia, Ndeke House, Haile Selassie Avenue, P.O. Box 30205, Lusaka, Zambia.
Featherstone G MangunjeFHI 360 Zambia, Tiyende Pamodzi Road, Off Nangwenya Road, Farmers Village, Showgrounds Area, P.O. Box 320303, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia.
Mercy L KatokaFHI 360 Zambia, Tiyende Pamodzi Road, Off Nangwenya Road, Farmers Village, Showgrounds Area, P.O. Box 320303, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia.
Holly M BurkeReproductive, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health, FHI 360, 359 Blackwell Street, Suite 200, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
Bupe MusondaMinistry of Health, Government of the Republic of Zambia, Ndeke House, Haile Selassie Avenue, P.O. Box 30205, Lusaka, Zambia.
Musonda MusondaUnited States Agency for International Development (USAID), Embassy of the United States of America, Subdivision 694/Stand 100 Ibex Hill Road, P.O. Box 320373, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia.
Catherine S ToddGlobal Health & Population, FHI 360, 359 Blackwell Street, Suite 200, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
Family Health International 360 · USMinistry of Health · ZMUnited States Agency for International Development · US

Funding

United States Agency for International Development AID-OAA-A-15-00045U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief 7200AA21CA00011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundZambian adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) have high HIV incidence and face barriers to the use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Parental support improves PrEP use and adherence in some settings, but negative parental attitudes toward HIV prevention may inhibit engagement with AGYW. We explored perceptions of future PrEP methods among AGYW and parents and parent-youth engagement on HIV prevention and PrEP use.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative descriptive study among AGYW and parents of AGYW in five provinces in Zambia in September-October 2021. We conducted 10 focus group discussions (FGDs) and four in-depth interviews (IDIs) with AGYW participants (n = 87) and seven FGDs and four IDIs among parents of AGYW (n = 62). All FGDs and IDIs were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed to identify qualitative themes.

resultsMost AGYW participants preferred the discreet nature and longer duration of injectable PrEP compared to the PrEP ring and oral PrEP. Many AGYWs reported inability to disclose PrEP use to their parents due to lack of parental support based on cultural taboos against premarital sex. Nevertheless, AGYW participants said they would like to talk to their parents about PrEP so their parents could support their use. Many parents also described difficulties discussing PrEP with their daughters because of cultural and religious beliefs about abstinence from sex before marriage. However, parents acknowledged that the threat of HIV is real and said they need PrEP knowledge and guidance on speaking with their children about HIV prevention and PrEP.

conclusionsAlthough many parents are currently not playing a role in daughters' decisions about PrEP use, both parents and AGYW are willing to engage with each other on HIV prevention issues. To foster parent-child engagement, HIV prevention programs should not only provide information about PrEP but also address social norms that impede discussion of HIV prevention and equip both parents and AGYW with skills and support for such conversations. Community sensitization is also needed as new PrEP products are introduced, to create an enabling environment for parent-child engagement by increasing awareness, countering misconceptions, and reducing stigma.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdolescentFemaleHumansSexual BehaviorZambiaAnti-HIV AgentsAdolescent girls and young womenHIV preventionParental engagementParentsPrEP

Identifiers

PMID38273282
PMCPMC10809647
OpenAlexW4391222439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.