Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38273274›Full record

ReviewBMC biology2024

Mitochondrial genomes revisited: why do different lineages retain different genes?

Anzhelika Butenko, Julius Lukeš, Dave Speijer, Jeremy G Wideman

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Mitochondrial genome ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Anzhelika ButenkoInstitute of Parasitology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, České Budějovice (Budweis), Czech Republic.
Julius LukešInstitute of Parasitology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, České Budějovice (Budweis), Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-0578-6618
Dave SpeijerMedical Biochemistry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeremy G WidemanCenter for Mechanisms of Evolution, Biodesign Institute, School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, USA. Jeremy.Wideman@asu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4426-9533
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLArizona State University · USUniversity of Ostrava · CZUniversity of South Bohemia in České Budějovice · CZ

Funding

Division of Biological Infrastructure DBI-2119963Grantová Agentura České Republiky 23-06479XGrantová Agentura České Republiky 23-07695S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mitochondria contain their own genome derived from an alphaproteobacterial endosymbiont. From thousands of protein-coding genes originally encoded by their ancestor, only between 1 and about 70 are encoded on extant mitochondrial genomes (mitogenomes). Thanks to a dramatically increasing number of sequenced and annotated mitogenomes a coherent picture of why some genes were lost, or relocated to the nucleus, is emerging. In this review, we describe the characteristics of mitochondria-to-nucleus gene transfer and the resulting varied content of mitogenomes across eukaryotes. We introduce a 'burst-upon-drift' model to best explain nuclear-mitochondrial population genetics with flares of transfer due to genetic drift.

Indexed as

Genome, MitochondrialBase SequenceEukaryotaEvolution, MolecularMitochondriaPhylogenyCoRR hypothesisEndosymbiont gene transferEvolutionary cell biologyMitochondrial DNAMitochondrial evolutionMitochondrial mutation rates

Identifiers

PMID38273274
PMCPMC10809612
OpenAlexW4391226788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.