Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38273259›Full record

Trial reportBMC emergency medicine2024

Effect of wet clothing removal on skin temperature in subjects exposed to cold and wrapped in a vapor barrier: a human, randomized, crossover field study.

Linn Therese Hagen, Guttorm Brattebø, Jörg Assmus Dipl-Math, Øystein Wiggen, Øyvind Østerås, Sigurd Mydske, Øyvind Thomassen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05996757 (Effect of Wet Clothing Removal in the Treatment of Accidental Hypothermia), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05996757 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Wet Clothing Removal in the Treatment of Accidental Hypothermia: A Human Crossover Field Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorHaukeland University HospitalRan2017 to 2017Enrolled8ConditionsAccidental Hypothermia, EmergenciesArmsWet clothing removal
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Accidental hypothermia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Linn Therese HagenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, P.O. Box 1400, Bergen, 5021, Norway. linn.hagen@norskluftambulanse.no.
Guttorm BrattebøDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, P.O. Box 1400, Bergen, 5021, Norway.
Jörg Assmus Dipl-MathMountain Medicine Research Group, The Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Bergen, Norway.
Øystein WiggenSINTEF Technology and Society, Preventive Health Research, Trondheim, Norway.
Øyvind ØsteråsDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, P.O. Box 1400, Bergen, 5021, Norway.
Sigurd MydskeDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, P.O. Box 1400, Bergen, 5021, Norway.
Øyvind ThomassenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, P.O. Box 1400, Bergen, 5021, Norway.
Haukeland University Hospital · NOSINTEF · NOUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrehospital care for cold-stressed and hypothermic patients focuses on effective insulation and rewarming. When encountering patients wearing wet clothing, rescuers can either remove the wet clothing before isolating the patient or isolate the patient using a vapor barrier. Wet clothing removal increases skin exposure but avoids the need to heat the wet clothing during rewarming. Leaving wet clothing on will avoid skin exposure but is likely to increase heat loss during rewarming. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of wet clothing removal compared to containing the moisture using a vapor barrier on skin temperature in a prehospital setting.

methodsThis randomized crossover experimental field study was conducted in a snow cave in Hemsedal, Norway. After an initial cooling phase of 30 min while wearing wet clothes, the participants were subjected to one of two rewarming scenarios: (1) wet clothing removal and wrapping in a vapor barrier, insulating blankets, and windproof outer shell (dry group) or (2) wrapping in a vapor barrier, insulating blankets, and windproof outer shell (wet group). The mean skin temperature was the primary outcome whereas subjective scores for both thermal comfort and degree of shivering were secondary outcomes. Primary outcome data were analyzed using the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).

resultsAfter an initial decrease in temperature during the exposure phase, the dry group had a higher mean skin temperature compared to the wet group after only 2 min. The skin-rewarming rate was highest in the initial rewarming stages for both groups, but increased in the dry group as compared to the wet group in the first 10 min. Return to baseline temperature occurred significantly faster in the dry group (mean 12.5 min [dry] vs. 28.1 min [wet]). No intergroup differences in the subjective thermal comfort or shivering were observed.

conclusionRemoval of wet clothing in combination with a vapor barrier increases skin rewarming rate compared to encasing the wet clothing in a vapor barrier, in mild cold and environments without wind.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05996757, retrospectively registered 18/08/2023.

Indexed as

HypothermiaSkin TemperatureBody Temperature RegulationClothingCold TemperatureCross-Over StudiesHumansAccidental hypothermiaActive external rewarmingClinical trialCrossoverEmergency medicineField studyHumanMountain medicineVapor barrierWet clothing

Identifiers

PMID38273259
PMCPMC10809790
OpenAlexW4391226698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.