Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38273258›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2024

A high-performance computational workflow to accelerate GATK SNP detection across a 25-genome dataset.

Yong Zhou, Nagarajan Kathiresan, Zhichao Yu, Luis F Rivera, Yujian Yang, Manjula Thimma, Keerthana Manickam, Dmytro Chebotarov, Ramil Mauleon, Kapeel Chougule and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. First report of whole genome sequence of a Mycobacterium bovis (3/86Rv) strain isolated from a cow in India.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Protein truncating splice site variant inInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Yong Zhou *Center for Desert Agriculture (CDA), Biological and Environmental Sciences & Engineering Division (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Nagarajan Kathiresan *KAUST Supercomputing Laboratory (KSL), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Zhichao Yu *Center for Desert Agriculture (CDA), Biological and Environmental Sciences & Engineering Division (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Luis F Rivera *Center for Desert Agriculture (CDA), Biological and Environmental Sciences & Engineering Division (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Yujian YangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Manjula ThimmaCenter for Desert Agriculture (CDA), Biological and Environmental Sciences & Engineering Division (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Keerthana ManickamCenter for Desert Agriculture (CDA), Biological and Environmental Sciences & Engineering Division (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Dmytro ChebotarovInternational Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Baños, Laguna, 4031, Philippines.
Ramil MauleonInternational Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Baños, Laguna, 4031, Philippines.
Kapeel ChouguleCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 11724, USA.
Sharon WeiCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 11724, USA.
Tingting GaoNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Carl D GreenInformation Technology Department, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Andrea ZuccoloCenter for Desert Agriculture (CDA), Biological and Environmental Sciences & Engineering Division (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Weibo XieNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Doreen WareCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 11724, USA.
Jianwei ZhangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Kenneth L McNallyInternational Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Baños, Laguna, 4031, Philippines.
Rod A WingCenter for Desert Agriculture (CDA), Biological and Environmental Sciences & Engineering Division (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia. rwing@ag.arizona.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6633-6226

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSingle-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the most widely used form of molecular genetic variation studies. As reference genomes and resequencing data sets expand exponentially, tools must be in place to call SNPs at a similar pace. The genome analysis toolkit (GATK) is one of the most widely used SNP calling software tools publicly available, but unfortunately, high-performance computing versions of this tool have yet to become widely available and affordable.

resultsHere we report an open-source high-performance computing genome variant calling workflow (HPC-GVCW) for GATK that can run on multiple computing platforms from supercomputers to desktop machines. We benchmarked HPC-GVCW on multiple crop species for performance and accuracy with comparable results with previously published reports (using GATK alone). Finally, we used HPC-GVCW in production mode to call SNPs on a "subpopulation aware" 16-genome rice reference panel with ~ 3000 resequenced rice accessions. The entire process took ~ 16 weeks and resulted in the identification of an average of 27.3 M SNPs/genome and the discovery of ~ 2.3 million novel SNPs that were not present in the flagship reference genome for rice (i.e., IRGSP RefSeq).

conclusionsThis study developed an open-source pipeline (HPC-GVCW) to run GATK on HPC platforms, which significantly improved the speed at which SNPs can be called. The workflow is widely applicable as demonstrated successfully for four major crop species with genomes ranging in size from 400 Mb to 2.4 Gb. Using HPC-GVCW in production mode to call SNPs on a 25 multi-crop-reference genome data set produced over 1.1 billion SNPs that were publicly released for functional and breeding studies. For rice, many novel SNPs were identified and were found to reside within genes and open chromatin regions that are predicted to have functional consequences. Combined, our results demonstrate the usefulness of combining a high-performance SNP calling architecture solution with a subpopulation-aware reference genome panel for rapid SNP discovery and public deployment.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantPolymorphism, Single NucleotideHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPlant BreedingSoftwareWorkflowGenome Analysis Toolkit (GATK)High-performance computing (HPC)MaizeRiceSingle-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)SorghumSoybean

Identifiers

PMID38273258
PMCPMC10809545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.