Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38273256›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2024

Differentiated genomic footprints suggest isolation and long-distance migration of Hmong-Mien populations.

Guanglin He, Peixin Wang, Jing Chen, Yan Liu, Yuntao Sun, Rong Hu, Shuhan Duan, Qiuxia Sun, Renkuan Tang, Junbao Yang and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Guanglin He *Institute of Rare Diseases, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China. guanglinhescu@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6614-5267
Peixin WangInstitute of Rare Diseases, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Jing ChenInstitute of Rare Diseases, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Yan LiuInstitute of Rare Diseases, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Yuntao SunInstitute of Rare Diseases, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Rong HuSchool of Sociology and Anthropology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China.
Shuhan DuanInstitute of Rare Diseases, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Qiuxia SunInstitute of Rare Diseases, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Renkuan TangDepartment of Forensic Medicine, College of Basic Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400331, China.
Junbao YangSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, 637000, China.
Zhiyong WangInstitute of Rare Diseases, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Libing YunInstitute of Forensic Medicine, West China School of Basic Science & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Liping HuInstitute of Rare Diseases, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Jiangwei YanSchool of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, Jinzhong, 030001, China.
Shengjie NieSchool of Forensic Medicine, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, 650500, China.
Lanhai Wei *School of Ethnology and Anthropology, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Inner Mongolia, 010028, China.
Chao LiuFaculty of Forensic Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China. liuchaogzf@163.com.
Mengge Wang *Institute of Rare Diseases, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China. Menggewang2021@163.com.

Funding

Major Project of Philosophy and Social Science Research in Colleges and Universities of Jiangsu Province 23&ZD203National Natural Science Foundation of China 82202078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe underrepresentation of Hmong-Mien (HM) people in Asian genomic studies has hindered our comprehensive understanding of the full landscape of their evolutionary history and complex trait architecture. South China is a multi-ethnic region and indigenously settled by ethnolinguistically diverse HM, Austroasiatic (AA), Tai-Kadai (TK), Austronesian (AN), and Sino-Tibetan (ST) people, which is regarded as East Asia's initial cradle of biodiversity. However, previous fragmented genetic studies have only presented a fraction of the landscape of genetic diversity in this region, especially the lack of haplotype-based genomic resources. The deep characterization of demographic history and natural-selection-relevant genetic architecture of HM people was necessary.

resultsWe reported one HM-specific genomic resource and comprehensively explored the fine-scale genetic structure and adaptative features inferred from the genome-wide SNP data of 440 HM individuals from 33 ethnolinguistic populations, including previously unreported She. We identified solid genetic differentiation between HM people and Han Chinese at 7.64‒15.86 years ago (kya) and split events between southern Chinese inland (Miao/Yao) and coastal (She) HM people in the middle Bronze Age period and the latter obtained more gene flow from Ancient Northern East Asians. Multiple admixture models further confirmed that extensive gene flow from surrounding ST, TK, and AN people entangled in forming the gene pool of Chinese coastal HM people. Genetic findings of isolated shared unique ancestral components based on the sharing alleles and haplotypes deconstructed that HM people from the Yungui Plateau carried the breadth of previously unknown genomic diversity. We identified a direct and recent genetic connection between Chinese inland and Southeast Asian HM people as they shared the most extended identity-by-descent fragments, supporting the long-distance migration hypothesis. Uniparental phylogenetic topology and network-based phylogenetic relationship reconstruction found ancient uniparental founding lineages in southwestern HM people. Finally, the population-specific biological adaptation study identified the shared and differentiated natural selection signatures among inland and coastal HM people associated with physical features and immune functions. The allele frequency spectrum of cancer susceptibility alleles and pharmacogenomic genes showed significant differences between HM and northern Chinese people.

conclusionsOur extensive genetic evidence combined with the historical documents supported the view that ancient HM people originated from the Yungui regions associated with ancient "Three-Miao tribes" descended from the ancient Daxi-Qujialing-Shijiahe people. Then, some have recently migrated rapidly to Southeast Asia, and some have migrated eastward and mixed respectively with Southeast Asian indigenes, Liangzhu-related coastal ancient populations, and incoming southward ST people. Generally, complex population migration, admixture, and adaptation history contributed to the complicated patterns of population structure of geographically diverse HM people.

Indexed as

East Asian PeopleGenetics, PopulationChinaGenomicsHaplotypesHumansPhylogenyAdmixture eventsDemographic historyDifferentiated genetic structureGenetic diversityHmong-Mien speaker

Identifiers

PMID38273256
PMCPMC10809681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.