Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38273129›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2024

Renal Function After CT-Guided Cryoablation of Small Renal Tumours in Patients with Solitary Kidney: An Analysis of European Multinational Prospective EuRECA Registry.

Pia I Pietersen, Sarah Stougaard, Francis X Keeley, Brunolf Lagerveld, David Breen, Alexander King, Tommy K Nielsen, Marco van Strijen, Julien Garnon, Des Alcorn and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.

Pia I PietersenDepartment of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 37, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Sarah StougaardDepartment of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 37, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Francis X KeeleyBristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Brunolf LagerveldDepartment of Urology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
David BreenDepartment of Radiology, Southampton University Hospitals, Southampton, UK.
Alexander KingDepartment of Radiology, Southampton University Hospitals, Southampton, UK.
Tommy K NielsenDepartment of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Marco van StrijenDepartment of Radiology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Julien GarnonDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, 67096, Strasbourg cedex, France.
Des AlcornDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Eric de KervilerRadiology Department, Saint-Louis Hospital, AP-HP, 1, Avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75475, Paris cedex 10, France.
Patricia ZondervanDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tze M WahDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute of Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Theresa JunkerDepartment of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 37, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Ole GraumannDepartment of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 37, 5000, Odense, Denmark. olegraumann@dadlnet.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9663-8361
University of Southern Denmark · DKNIHR Southampton Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit · GBAarhus University Hospital · DKAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRGartnavel General Hospital · GBHôpital Civil, Strasbourg · FRNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBOLVG · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLSt James's University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTreatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in patients with solitary kidneys remains challenging. The purpose of this multicentre cohort study was to explore how renal function is affected by percutaneous image-guided cryoablation in patients with solitary kidneys. MATERIAL AND

methodsData from the European Registry for Renal Cryoablation database were extracted on patients with RCC in solitary kidneys treated with image-guided, percutaneous cryoablation. Patients were excluded if they had multiple tumours, had received previous treatment of the tumour, or were treated with more than one cryoablation procedure. Pre- and post-treatment eGFR (within 3 months of the procedure) were compared.

resultsOf 222 patients with solitary kidneys entered into the database, a total of 70 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean baseline eGFR was 55.8 ± 16.8 mL/min/1.73 m

conclusionImage-guided renal cryoablation appears to be safe and effective for renal function preservation in patients with RCC in a solitary kidney. Following cryoablation, all patients had preservation of renal function without the need for dialysis or progression in chronic kidney disease stage despite the statistically significant reduction in eGFR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3: Observational study.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellCryosurgeryGlomerular Filtration RateKidney NeoplasmsRegistriesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedEuropeFemaleHumansKidneyMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRadiography, InterventionalSolitary KidneyCryoablationImage-guidedRenal cell carcinomaRenal functionRenal massesSolitary kidney

Identifiers

PMID38273129
PMCPMC11074031
OpenAlexW4391218088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.