Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38273127›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2024

New immune cell engagers for cancer immunotherapy.

Aurore Fenis, Olivier Demaria, Laurent Gauthier, Eric Vivier, Emilie Narni-Mancinelli

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. CD112 Lactylation Drives Dual Immune Evasion From CD8+ T Cells and NK Cells.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aurore FenisInnate Pharma Research Laboratories, Innate Pharma, Marseille, France.
Olivier DemariaInnate Pharma Research Laboratories, Innate Pharma, Marseille, France.
Laurent GauthierInnate Pharma Research Laboratories, Innate Pharma, Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3225-4825
Eric VivierInnate Pharma Research Laboratories, Innate Pharma, Marseille, France.
Emilie Narni-MancinelliAix Marseille Université, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, INSERM, Centre d'Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy, Marseille, France. narni@ciml.univ-mrs.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7001-1026

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There have been major advances in the immunotherapy of cancer in recent years, including the development of T cell engagers - antibodies engineered to redirect T cells to recognize and kill cancer cells - for the treatment of haematological malignancies. However, the field still faces several challenges to develop agents that are consistently effective in a majority of patients and cancer types, such as optimizing drug dose, overcoming treatment resistance and improving efficacy in solid tumours. A new generation of T cell-targeted molecules was developed to tackle these issues that are potentially more effective and safer. In addition, agents designed to engage the antitumour activities of other immune cells, including natural killer cells and myeloid cells, are showing promise and have the potential to treat a broader range of cancers.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyKiller Cells, NaturalNeoplasmsT-LymphocytesAnimalsHumansMyeloid Cells

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.