ArticleScientific reports2024
Establish a novel tumor budding-related signature to predict prognosis and guide clinical therapy in colorectal cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrative single-cell and bulk transcriptomic analysis identifies lesion-associated gene signatures for prognostic stratification and therapeutic guidance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
- Intratumoral Microorganisms in Tumors: Current Understanding and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies.MedComm · 2026Review
- Intratumour oxidative hotspots provide a niche for cancer cell dissemination.Nature cell biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Tumor budding is a long-established independent adverse prognostic marker for colorectal cancer (CRC), yet assessment of tumor budding was not reproducible. Therefore, development of precise diagnostic approaches to tumor budding is in demand. In this study, we first performed bioinformatic analysis in our single-center CRC patients' cohort (n = 84) and identified tumor budding-associated hub genes using the weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). A machine learning methodology was used to identify hub genes and construct a prognostic signature. Nomogram model was used to identified hub genes score for tumor budding, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calibration plot indicated high accuracy and stability of hub gene score for predicted the prognosis of CRC. The association between budding-associated hub genes and score and prognosis of CRC were further verified in TCGA CRC cohort (n = 342). Then gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and gene set variation analysis (GSVA) were applied to explore the signaling pathways related to the tumor budding and validated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) of our clinical samples. Subsequently, immune infiltration analysis demonstrated that there was a high correlation between hub genes score and M2-like macrophages infiltrated in tumor tissue. In addition, somatic mutation and chemotherapeutic response prediction were analyzed based on the risk signature. In summary, we established a tumor budding diagnostic molecular model, which can improve tumor budding assessment and provides a promising novel molecular marker for immunotherapy and prognosis of CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.