ArticleScientific reports2024
Real-time prediction of ROP based on GRU-Informer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- An improved GRU method for slope stress prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Optimizing stroke prediction using gated recurrent unit and feature selection in Sub-Saharan Africa.Clinical neurology and neurosurgery · 2025Article
- Drilling Rate of Penetration Prediction Based on CBT-LSTM Neural Network.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- SMGformer: integrating STL and multi-head self-attention in deep learning model for multi-step runoff forecasting.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate ROP (rate of penetration) prediction contributes to better production task planning, ensuring efficient production line operation, and reducing production costs. ROP prediction is influenced by multiple factors, making accurate prediction challenging. Current research primarily relies on historical data for training and modeling, lacking methods for real-time ROP prediction. This paper introduces a GRU-Informer model for real-time ROP prediction. The model employs GRU (Gated Recurrent Unit) neural networks at the lower level to capture short-term correlations in drilling parameters and uses the Informer model at the top to address long-term dependencies among drilling parameters. Thus, the GRU-Informer can capture both short-term and long-term time dependencies, providing better ROP predictions. This paper constructs a dataset using historical data from a southwestern Chinese oil field for experimentation. RMSE (Root Mean Square Error), MAE (mean absolute error) and [Formula: see text] (Coefficient of Determination) are employed as evaluation metrics for the model. Experimental results demonstrate that the GRU-Informer outperforms traditional recurrent neural networks like LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory), GRU neural networks and Informer in real-time ROP prediction, indicating its practical value.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.