Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38272950›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A processing-type active real-time traceable certification system.

Chia-Chun Wu, Chung-Huei Ling, Min-Shiang Hwang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chia-Chun Wu *Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Quemoy University, Kinmen, 892, Taiwan.
Chung-Huei Ling *Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Asia University, Taichung, 41354, Taiwan.
Min-Shiang HwangDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Asia University, Taichung, 41354, Taiwan. mshwang@asia.edu.tw.

Funding

National Science and Technology Council MOST 109-2221-E-468-011-MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to substituting low-price and low-quality materials for high-quality materials at the food processing stage, many dishonest businesses risk adulterating chemical materials in products to reduce production costs or increase product flavor with chemical synthesis spices. As a result, the risks to food safety are increased. Most safety management and certification regulations proceed with on-site examination or sampling inspection. As current certification systems lack complete tracking and real-time certification processes, they cannot comprehensively check foods' processing and production processes and contents. Hence, food safety problems sway consumers' trust and confidence in certification systems. This study intends to improve the agricultural processing end's current food traceability certification system. Adding the design of raw material total quantity control provides a complete and sound real-time certification mechanism for citizens and businesses to assure consumer rights.

Indexed as

Food HandlingFood SafetyCertificationSafety ManagementSpices

Identifiers

PMID38272950
PMCPMC11231329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.