Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38272913›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Robustly federated learning model for identifying high-risk patients with postoperative gastric cancer recurrence.

Bao Feng, Jiangfeng Shi, Liebin Huang, Zhiqi Yang, Shi-Ting Feng, Jianpeng Li, Qinxian Chen, Huimin Xue, Xiangguang Chen, Cuixia Wan and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Global trends in artificial intelligence applications for gastric cancer prediction, treatment, and management: a topic modeling and bibliometric analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Federated Learning for Predicting Major Postoperative Complications.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Bao Feng *Department of Radiology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, China.
Jiangfeng Shi *Laboratory of Intelligent Detection and Information Processing, Guilin University of Aerospace Technology, Guilin, China.
Liebin Huang *Department of Radiology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, China.
Zhiqi YangDepartment of Radiology, Meizhou People's Hospital, Meizhou, China.
Shi-Ting FengDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jianpeng LiDepartment of Radiology, Dongguan People's Hospital, Dongguan, China.
Qinxian ChenDepartment of Radiology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, China.
Huimin XueDepartment of Radiology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, China.
Xiangguang ChenDepartment of Radiology, Meizhou People's Hospital, Meizhou, China.
Cuixia WanDepartment of Radiology, Meizhou People's Hospital, Meizhou, China.
Qinghui HuLaboratory of Intelligent Detection and Information Processing, Guilin University of Aerospace Technology, Guilin, China.
Enming CuiDepartment of Radiology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0634-822X
Yehang ChenLaboratory of Intelligent Detection and Information Processing, Guilin University of Aerospace Technology, Guilin, China. cyh93yl@163.com.ORCID 0009-0002-3724-3957
Wansheng LongDepartment of Radiology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, China. jmlws2@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1331-1858

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prediction of patient disease risk via computed tomography (CT) images and artificial intelligence techniques shows great potential. However, training a robust artificial intelligence model typically requires large-scale data support. In practice, the collection of medical data faces obstacles related to privacy protection. Therefore, the present study aims to establish a robust federated learning model to overcome the data island problem and identify high-risk patients with postoperative gastric cancer recurrence in a multicentre, cross-institution setting, thereby enabling robust treatment with significant value. In the present study, we collect data from four independent medical institutions for experimentation. The robust federated learning model algorithm yields area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.710, 0.798, 0.809, and 0.869 across four data centres. Additionally, the effectiveness of the algorithm is evaluated, and both adaptive and common features are identified through analysis.

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceHumansLearning

Identifiers

PMID38272913
PMCPMC10811238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.