Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38272873›Full record

ReviewNature communications2024

Roadmapping the next generation of silicon photonics.

Sudip Shekhar, Wim Bogaerts, Lukas Chrostowski, John E Bowers, Michael Hochberg, Richard Soref, Bhavin J Shastri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. High-Endurance, Low-Loss SbACS photonics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Giant Anisotropy and High Second-Order Nonlinearity of 3R-MoSAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Spin-photon qubits for scalable quantum network.Light, science & applications · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sudip ShekharDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, 2332 Main Mall, Vancouver, V6T1Z4, BC, Canada. sudip@ece.ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0383-1929
Wim BogaertsDepartment of Information Technology, Ghent University - IMEC, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 126, Ghent, 9052, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1112-8950
Lukas ChrostowskiDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, 2332 Main Mall, Vancouver, V6T1Z4, BC, Canada.
John E BowersDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, 93106, CA, USA.
Michael HochbergLuminous Computing, 4750 Patrick Henry Drive, Santa Clara, 95054, CA, USA.
Richard SorefCollege of Science and Mathematics, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 William T. Morrissey Blvd., Boston, 02125, MA, USA.
Bhavin J ShastriDepartment of Physics, Engineering Physics & Astronomy, Queen's University, 64 Bader Lane, Kingston, K7L3N6, ON, Canada. bhavin.shastri@queensu.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5040-8248

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Silicon photonics has developed into a mainstream technology driven by advances in optical communications. The current generation has led to a proliferation of integrated photonic devices from thousands to millions-mainly in the form of communication transceivers for data centers. Products in many exciting applications, such as sensing and computing, are around the corner. What will it take to increase the proliferation of silicon photonics from millions to billions of units shipped? What will the next generation of silicon photonics look like? What are the common threads in the integration and fabrication bottlenecks that silicon photonic applications face, and which emerging technologies can solve them? This perspective article is an attempt to answer such questions. We chart the generational trends in silicon photonics technology, drawing parallels from the generational definitions of CMOS technology. We identify the crucial challenges that must be solved to make giant strides in CMOS-foundry-compatible devices, circuits, integration, and packaging. We identify challenges critical to the next generation of systems and applications-in communication, signal processing, and sensing. By identifying and summarizing such challenges and opportunities, we aim to stimulate further research on devices, circuits, and systems for the silicon photonics ecosystem.

Identifiers

PMID38272873
PMCPMC10811194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.