SynthesisInternational wound journal2024
Effects of fast-track recovery programme on the surgical site wound infection in patients undergoing biliary stones surgery: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of fast-track recovery programme on the surgical site wound infection in patients undergoing biliary stones surgery: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2024Pooled it
- RETRACTION: Effects of Fast-Track Recovery Programme on the Surgical Site Wound Infection in Patients Undergoing Biliary Stones Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.International wound journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-03-03Author Unresponsive · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To systematically evaluate the effects of a fast-track recovery programme on perioperative wound infections and postoperative complications in patients undergoing biliary tone surgery, we conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, China Biomedical Literature Database, Wanfang and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases from inception to 29 September 2023 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on the application of a fast-track recovery programme in patients undergoing biliary stone surgery. Two researchers independently screened and evaluated the studies based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and data were subsequently extracted from the included studies. Stata software (version 17.0) was employed for data analysis. Overall, 19 RCTs involving 2363 patients were included, with 1178 patients allocated to the fast-track recovery programme group and 1185 to the conventional care group. The results revealed a significantly lower occurrence of wound infection (3.74% vs. 9.45%, OR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.25-0.51, p < 0.001) and postoperative complications (11.38% vs. 27.34%, OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.25-0.39, p < 0.001) in the fast-track recovery programme group compared to the conventional care group. The available evidence supports the assertion that implementing a fast-track recovery programme in the perioperative period of patients undergoing biliary stone surgery effectively reduces the incidence of wound infections and postoperative complications while facilitating postoperative recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.