Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38272802›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2024

Prediction of amputation risk of patients with diabetic foot using classification algorithms: A clinical study from a tertiary center.

Denizhan Demirkol, Çiğdem Selçukcan Erol, Xavier Tannier, Tuncay Özcan, Şamil Aktaş

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Surgical treatment of diabetic foot: a spatial analysis, Ceará, Brazil, 2016-2021.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2025
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Denizhan DemirkolFaculty of Engineering, Department of Computer Engineering, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7343-9610
Çiğdem Selçukcan ErolScience Faculty, Department of Biology, Division of Botany & Department of Informatics, Istanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5057-7145
Xavier TannierInserm, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Laboratoire d'Informatique Médicale et d'Ingénierie des connaissances en e-Santé, LIMICS, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2452-8868
Tuncay ÖzcanFaculty of Management, Management Engineering Department, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9520-2494
Şamil AktaşIstanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Underwater and Hyperbaric Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9242-3179
Istanbul University · TRAdnan Menderes University · TRInserm · FRIstanbul Technical University · TR

Funding

Campus FranceTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcers can have vital consequences, such as amputation for patients. The primary purpose of this study is to predict the amputation risk of diabetic foot patients using machine-learning classification algorithms. In this research, 407 patients treated with the diagnosis of diabetic foot between January 2009-September 2019 in Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine in the Department of Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine were retrospectively evaluated. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to identify the key features associated with the amputation risk in diabetic foot patients within the dataset. Thus, various prediction/classification models were created to predict the "overall" risk of diabetic foot patients. Predictive machine-learning models were created using various algorithms. Additionally to optimize the hyperparameters of the Random Forest Algorithm (RF), experimental use of Bayesian Optimization (BO) has been employed. The sub-dimension data set comprising categorical and numerical values was subjected to a feature selection procedure. Among all the algorithms tested under the defined experimental conditions, the BO-optimized "RF" based on the hybrid approach (PCA-RF-BO) and "Logistic Regression" algorithms demonstrated superior performance with 85% and 90% test accuracies, respectively. In conclusion, our findings would serve as an essential benchmark, offering valuable guidance in reducing such hazards.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic FootAlgorithmsAmputation, SurgicalBayes TheoremHumansRetrospective Studiesamputationartificial intelligenceclassificationdiabetic footmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38272802
PMCPMC10789580
OpenAlexW4390894086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.