ArticleInternational wound journal2024
Identification of novel biomarkers of ferroptosis involved in keloid based on bioinformatics analysis.
Article in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metabolic reprogramming and ferroptosis in keloid pathogenesis: new insights for targeted therapy.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- A panoramic analysis of keloid pathogenesis: multidimensional network regulation of genetics-immunity-metabolism-mechanical force.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The emerging role and therapeutical implications of ferroptosis in wound healing.Burns & trauma · 2025Review
- Repair and regeneration: ferroptosis in the process of remodeling and fibrosis in impaired organs.Cell death discovery · 2024Review
- Skin Aging and the Upcoming Role of Ferroptosis in Geroscience.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Identification of novel biomarkers of ferroptosis involved in keloid based on bioinformatics analysis.International wound journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Keloid is a fibroproliferative disease of unknown aetiology, which has a significant impact the quality of life of patients. Ferroptosis plays an important role in the occurrence and development of fibrosis, but there is still a lack of research related to keloids. The objective of this work was to identify the hub genes related to ferroptosis in keloid to better understand the keloid process. The microarray data (GSE7890 GSE145725, and GSE44270) (23 keloid and 22 normal fibroblast) were analysed via the gene expression comprehensive database (GEO). Only GSE7890 met the FerrDB database. Cell cycle and pathway analysis were performed with gene ontology (GO) and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis was performed to differentially expressed genes (DEG). The differential genes were confirmed in other GEO datasets (GSE145725 and GSE44270), and multi-fibrosis-gene correlation analysed. To validate these hub genes, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was conducted. A total of 581 DEGs were screened, with 417 genes down-regulated and 164 genes up-regulated, with 11 ferroptosis genes significantly up-regulated in both keloid and normal tissue, and 6 genes are consistent with our findings and are associated with multiple fibrosis genes. The qRT-PCR results and tissues of normal skin and keloid agreed with our predictions. Our findings provide new evidence for the ferroptosis-related molecular pathways and biomarker of keloid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.