ArticleBMJ open2024
Clinical characteristics and healthcare utilisation associated with undiagnosed cognitive impairment in elderly patients with diabetes in a primary care setting: a population-based cohort study.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Impact of Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors (SGLT2i) Therapy on Dementia and Cognitive Decline.Biomedicines · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe objective of this study is to report the prevalence, clinical characteristics and healthcare utilisation of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and previously undiagnosed cognitive impairment who were identified as having a low Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score.
designA population-based cohort study comparing clinical characteristics, medications, outpatient and inpatient care of patients with a MoCA score <19 to MoCA >26 using descriptive statistics, linear regression and multivariate logistic regression.
settingElectronic medical records of a large health maintenance organisation in Israel.
participants350 patients, age >65 with T2DM who participated in a cognitive function screening initiative using MoCA, and had a follow-up visit during the 12 months after screening.
results130 (37.1%) had a MoCA score >26 and 68 (19.4%) <19. Patients with MoCA<19 had more diabetes-related complications, poorer glycaemic and lipid control, fewer visits to their main primary care physician (PCP; 3.9±3.2 vs 7.3±4.2 visits/year p=0.008), shorter duration of PCP visits (8.3±4.5 vs 4.0±3.5 min, p=0.007), fewer nutritionist and endocrinologist visits, and lower participation in diabetes or smoking cessation workshops. They were less likely to be treated with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4), or sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and more likely to receive insulin or sulfonylurea. Moreover, they had more emergency room visits (ER; 15 (11.5%) vs 16 (23.5%), p=0.019), hospitalisations (8 (6.2%) vs 22 (32.4%), p=0.001), and longer hospital stays (4.3±3.2 vs 14.5±9.8, p=0.001). Using statistical models, MoCA<19 was identified as a risk factor for fewer and shorter PCP visits and more ER visits and hospitalisations.
conclusionsThis study highlights the high prevalence of undiagnosed severe cognitive impairment in elderly patients with T2DM and its association with poor outpatient care. Appropriate interventions are needed to improve outcomes and prevent hospitalisation in this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.