Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38272272›Full record

ArticlePharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior2024

Differential disruption of response alternation by precipitated Δ

Matthew L Eckard, Steven G Kinsey

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew L EckardDepartment of Psychology, Radford University, Radford, VA, USA. Electronic address: mleckard@radford.edu.
Steven G KinseySchool of Nursing, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Radford University · USUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

Reducing the deleterious effects of synthetic cannabinoid withdrawal on emotionality and motivationR03DA039335 · NIDA · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI KINSEY, STEVEN G. · 2018 to 2019
$150k
NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA039335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to overt somatic symptoms, cannabinoid withdrawal can also manifest as disruptions in motivation and attention. Experimental animal models using operant-conditioning approaches reveal these differences, in either antagonist-precipitated or spontaneous withdrawal models. However, these processes have yet to be characterized in the same subjects simultaneously. To differentiate between motivational and attentional processes disrupted in cannabinoid withdrawal, the current study used a response alternation task in which a fixed-ratio (FR) schedule repeatedly alternated between two spatially distinct response options throughout daily training sessions. This task yielded traditional measures of motivation (e.g., response latency) as well as attention (e.g., responses to the incorrect side). After two weeks of training, male and female C57BL/6 J mice either received vehicle or Δ

Indexed as

CannabinoidsSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeAnimalsDronabinolDrug Inverse AgonismFemaleHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPiperidinesPyrazolesReceptor, Cannabinoid, CB1RimonabantCannabinoidsDronabinolPiperidinesPyrazolesReceptor, Cannabinoid, CB1RimonabantAttentional deficitCannabinoid withdrawalCannabis use disorderMotivational deficitTHC abstinence

Identifiers

PMID38272272
PMCPMC10955601
OpenAlexW4391134154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.