Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38271642›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2024

Synthetic Data Improve Survival Status Prediction Models in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.

Hyunwook Kim, Won Seok Jang, Woo Seob Sim, Han Sang Kim, Jeong Eun Choi, Eun Sil Baek, Yu Rang Park, Sang Joon Shin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hyunwook KimDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Won Seok JangMiner School of Computer & Information Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA.ORCID 0009-0001-5439-7299
Woo Seob SimMedical Informatics Collaboration Unit, Department of Research Affairs, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0009-0002-3492-6904
Han Sang KimDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6504-9927
Jeong Eun ChoiOffice of Data Services at Division of Digital Health, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea.
Eun Sil BaekSongdang Institute for Cancer Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4127-1328
Yu Rang ParkDepartment of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4210-2094
Sang Joon ShinDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5350-7241

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn artificial intelligence-based modeling, working with a limited number of patient groups is challenging. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate whether applying synthetic data generation methods to the clinical data of small patient groups can enhance the performance of prediction models. MATERIALS AND

methodsA data set collected by the Cancer Registry Library Project from the Yonsei Cancer Center (YCC), Severance Hospital, between January 2008 and October 2020 was reviewed. Patients with colorectal cancer younger than 50 years who started their initial treatment at YCC were included. A Bayesian network-based synthesizing model was used to generate a synthetic data set, combined with the differential privacy (DP) method.

resultsA synthetic population of 5,005 was generated from a data set of 1,253 patients with 93 clinical features. The Hellinger distance and correlation difference metric were below 0.3 and 0.5, respectively, indicating no statistical difference. The overall survival by disease stage did not differ between the synthetic and original populations. Training with the synthetic data and validating with the original data showed the highest performances of 0.850, 0.836, and 0.790 for the Decision Tree, Random Forest, and XGBoost models, respectively. Comparison of synthetic data sets with different epsilon parameters from the original data sets showed improved performance >0.1%. For extremely small data sets, models using synthetic data outperformed those using only original data sets. The reidentification risk measures demonstrated that the epsilons between 0.1 and 100 fell below the baseline, indicating a preserved privacy state.

conclusionThe synthetic data generation approach enhances predictive modeling performance by maintaining statistical and clinical integrity, and simultaneously reduces privacy risks through the application of DP techniques.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceColorectal NeoplasmsBayes TheoremHospitalsHumansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38271642
PMCPMC10830088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.