ArticlePLOS global public health2024
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and policy response on access to and utilization of reproductive, maternal, child and adolescent health services in Kenya, Uganda and Zambia.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Establishing the effect of COVID-19 lockdown policy on the utilization of facility-based delivery in Kenya: a multi-method study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Health providers' perspectives on effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and anti-epidemic measures on maternal health services in Nairobi, Kenya: a qualitative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Exploring key challenges for healthcare providers and stakeholders in delivering adolescent sexual and reproductive health services and information during the COVID-19 pandemic in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global health crises can negatively impact access to and utilisation of essential health services. Access to and utilisation of reproductive health services were already challenged in Sub-Saharan Africa with the COVID-19 pandemic further complicating the critical situation. This cross-sectional qualitative study aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and policy responses to it on the access to, and utilization of reproductive, maternal, child and adolescent health services in Kenya, Uganda, and Zambia. It sought to explore the perspectives of women of reproductive age (18-49), frontline health workers and government representatives, all from geographies that are under-researched in this context. Using purposive sampling, key informant and in-depth interviews were carried out with 63 participants across the three countries between November 2020 and February 2021. The study population included women of reproductive age (18-49 years), front-line health service providers, and government representatives We established that COVID-19 and the policy response to it affected access to and utilization of services in the three countries, the most affected being antenatal care, delivery, family planning, and immunization services. Women reported not accessing the health facilities for various reasons. Barriers to access and utilization of services cut across all the socioecological levels. Movement restrictions, particularly in Uganda where they were most severe, and fear of contracting COVID-19 at health facilities were the most reported barriers. Weak structures at community level and inadequate supply of commodities in health facilities exacerbated the situation. Mitigation factors were put in place at different levels. There is need to strengthen the health system, particularly the supply chain and to have services closer to the community to enhance access to and utilisation of services at all times and particularly during crises such as the Covid-19 pandemic.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.