Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38271449›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Agent-based vs. equation-based multi-scale modeling for macrophage polarization.

Sarah B Minucci, Rebecca L Heise, Angela M Reynolds

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah B MinucciDepartment of Mathematics & Applied Mathematics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America.
Rebecca L HeiseDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America.
Angela M ReynoldsDepartment of Mathematics & Applied Mathematics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8494-3166

Funding

Extracellular Matrix-Derived Nanoparticles for Repairing Lung InjuryR21HL146250 · NHLBI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI HEISE, REBECCA LONG · 2019 to 2020
$398k
NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL146250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrophages show high plasticity and result in heterogenic subpopulations or polarized states identified by specific cellular markers. These immune cells are typically characterized as pro-inflammatory, or classically activated M1, and anti-inflammatory, or alternatively activated M2. However, a more precise definition places them along a spectrum of activation where they may exhibit a number of pro- or anti-inflammatory roles. To understand M1-M2 dynamics in the context of a localized response and explore the results of different mathematical modeling approaches based on the same biology, we utilized two different modeling techniques, ordinary differential equation (ODE) modeling and agent-based modeling (ABM), to simulate the spectrum of macrophage activation to general pro- and anti-inflammatory stimuli on an individual and multi-cell level. The ODE model includes two hallmark pro- and anti-inflammatory signaling pathways and the ABM incorporates similar M1-M2 dynamics but in a spatio-temporal platform. Both models link molecular signaling with cellular-level dynamics. We then performed simulations with various initial conditions to replicate different experimental setups. Similar results were observed in both models after tuning to a common calibrating experiment. Comparing the two models' results sheds light on the important features of each modeling approach. When more data is available these features can be considered when choosing techniques to best fit the needs of the modeler and application.

Indexed as

Macrophage ActivationMacrophagesAnti-Inflammatory AgentsSignal TransductionAnti-Inflammatory Agents

Identifiers

PMID38271449
PMCPMC10810539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.