Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38271413›Full record

SynthesisIndian journal of ophthalmology2024

Lenticule addition keratoplasty for the treatment of keratoconus: A systematic review and critical considerations.

Yanling Liu, Yan He, Yingping Deng, Lixiang Wang

Open access · diamondAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yanling LiuOperating Room, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Yan HeOperating Room, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Yingping DengDepartment of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Lixiang WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Sichuan University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Keratoconus is a corneal disorder characterized by the progressive thinning and bulging of the cornea. Currently, the major goal of management is to halt its progression, restore normal corneal strength, prevent acute complications, and save vision. Penetrating keratoplasty and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty as conventional surgical methods for advanced keratoconus are limited by relatively high rates of immune intolerance, slow post-operational recovery, high costs, and shortage of donor corneas. Recently, the development of lenticule addition keratoplasty enables the restoration of corneal thickness simply by implanting a lenticule into the stromal pocket created with the femtosecond laser, which can originate from cadaver corneas or more appealing, be extracted from patients via a small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery. As the first systematic review in this field, we critically review publications on lenticule addition keratoplasty and provide our perspectives on its clinical application and the focus of future research.

Indexed as

Corneal TransplantationKeratoconusCorneaCorneal StromaHumansKeratoplasty, PenetratingLasers

Identifiers

PMID38271413
PMCPMC11624644
OpenAlexW4391215249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.