Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38270814›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2024

Patient-physician communication about cancer-related fatigue: a survey of patient-perceived barriers.

Marlena Milzer, Anna S Wagner, Martina E Schmidt, Imad Maatouk, Silke Hermann, Cancer Registry of Baden-Württemberg, Senta Kiermeier, Karen Steindorf

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04921644 (Longitudinal Investigation of Cancer-related Fatigue and Its Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04921644 active not recruitingnot on this map

Longitudinal Investigation of Cancer-related Fatigue and Its Treatment (LIFT Project)

TypeobservationalSponsorGerman Cancer Research CenterRan2021 to 2028Enrolled1,183ConditionsCancer-related Fatigue
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Management of Fatigue in Adult Survivors of Cancer: ASCO-Society for Integrative Oncology Guideline Update.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Current non-pharmacological practices for cancer-related fatigue in oncology rehabilitation: results of a national provider survey.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Co-designing a web-based intervention (RESTORE) to support self-management of cancer-related fatigue in people living with a brain tumour.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  11. Barriers to discussing fatigue in oncological care: a comparative study of patient perspectives after two decades.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Physicians' perspectives on cancer-related fatigue management and their suggestions for improvements in medical training: a cross-sectional survey study in Germany.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marlena MilzerDivision of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5864-068X
Anna S WagnerSection of Psychosomatic Medicine, Psychotherapy and Psychooncology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Julius-Maximilian-University, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9272-4036
Martina E SchmidtDivision of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2095-2426
Imad MaatoukSection of Psychosomatic Medicine, Psychotherapy and Psychooncology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Julius-Maximilian-University, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8030-1182
Silke HermannEpidemiological Cancer Registry of Baden-Württemberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Cancer Registry of Baden-Württemberg
Senta KiermeierSection of Psychosomatic Medicine, Psychotherapy and Psychooncology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Julius-Maximilian-University, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5815-5713
Karen SteindorfDivision of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. k.steindorf@dkfz-heidelberg.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5215-5651

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grants No. MA 7865/3-1, SCHM 3423/3-1, STE 1493/6-1, Project No. 438839893
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCancer-related fatigue is a subjective, distressing, and common sequela of cancer which is often disregarded and underdiagnosed. Fatigue is assessed by self-report requiring communication between patient and physician. In this study, we investigated the patients' perspective on the patient-physician communication about fatigue.

methodsOn average five months after diagnosis 1179 cancer patients, recruited in Germany, completed a survey as part of the LIFT project. The survey included questions on sociodemographic data, fatigue, depression, fatigue management, patient-physician communication, and communication barriers. Data were analyzed descriptively and using logistic regression analyses.

resultsHalf of the participants reported that their physician had never asked them whether they felt exhausted. Patients undergoing chemo-, radio-, or immunotherapy were more likely to be asked about fatigue, while older age and major depression decreased the likelihood. Sixty-four percent of the patients felt impeded by communication barriers. Common barriers were not knowing who to turn to for fatigue (39%), time constraints (31%), and the fear of being perceived as weak (22%). Almost half of the participants indicated that their physicians were not appreciative and did not deal adequately with fatigue-related questions.

conclusionThis study revealed gaps in the patient-physician communication regarding cancer-related fatigue. Contrary to guideline recommendations a minority of physicians addressed fatigue. On the other hand, cancer patients felt reluctant to bring up this topic due to structural barriers and fears. Physicians should routinely address fatigue and adopt a communication style which encourages patients to likewise state their symptoms and raise their questions.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT04921644. Registered in June 2021.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPhysiciansCommunicationFatigueHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsCancer-related fatiguePatient participationPatient–physician communicationStructural barriersSupportive care

Identifiers

PMID38270814
PMCPMC10810981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.