Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38270536›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2024

Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer after a Nonsuspicious Prostate MRI-A Comparison with the General Population.

Juho Pylväläinen, Jaakko Hoffström, Anu Kenttämies, Anssi Auvinen, Tuomas Mirtti, Antti Rannikko

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Juho PylväläinenDepartment of Radiology, HUS Diagnostic Centre, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3192-3759
Jaakko HoffströmResearch Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0009-0003-4409-0458
Anu KenttämiesDepartment of Radiology, HUS Diagnostic Centre, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3937-5307
Anssi AuvinenTampere University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1125-4818
Tuomas MirttiResearch Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0455-9891
Antti RannikkoResearch Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4261-3484
University of Helsinki · FITampere University · FI

Funding

Cancer Foundation of Foundation 180141Competitive State Research Funding (VTR) TYH2021332Jane ja Aatos Erkon Säätiö (J&AE) 29.5.202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe compare the risk of clinically significant (csPCa; ISUP Grade Group ≥ 2) and insignificant prostate cancer (isPCa; ISUP Grade Group 1) in men with a nonsuspicious prostate MRI (nMRI; PI-RADS ≤ 2) with the general population, and assess the value of PSA density (PSAD) in stratification.

methodsIn this retrospective population-based cohort study we identified 1,682 50-79-year-old men, who underwent nMRI at HUS (2016-2019). We compared their age-standardized incidence rates (IR) of csPCa and the odds of isPCa to a local age- and sex-matched general population (n = 230,458) during a six-year follow-up. Comparisons were performed by calculating incidence rate ratios (IRR) and ORs with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We repeated the comparison for the 920 men with nMRI and PSAD < 0.15 ng/mL/cm3.

resultsCompared with the general population, the IR of csPCa was significantly higher after nMRI [1,852 vs. 552 per 100,000 person-years; IRR 3.4 (95% CI, 2.8-4.1)]. However, the IR was substantially lower if PSAD was low [778 per 100,000 person-years; IRR 1.4 (95% CI, 0.9-2.0)]. ORs for isPCa were 2.4 (95% CI, 1.7-3.5) for all men with nMRI and 5.0 (95% CI, 2.8-9.1) if PSAD was low.

conclusionsCompared with the general population, the risk of csPCa is not negligible after nMRI. However, men with nMRI and PSAD <0.15 ng/mL/cm3 have worse harm-benefit balance than men in the general population. IMPACT: Prostate biopsies for men with nMRI should be reserved for cases indicated by additional risk stratification. See related In the Spotlight, p. 641.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsAgedHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedProstateProstate-Specific AntigenRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID38270536
PMCPMC11061604
OpenAlexW4391231598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.