ArticleAging and disease2023
NeuroD1 Regulated Endothelial Gene Expression to Modulate Transduction of AAV-PHP.eB and Recovery Progress after Ischemic Stroke.
Article in Aging and disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clemastine alleviates cognitive dysfunction after SAH by targeting neuronal CNTN1 to regulate the ADA-adenosine pathway.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Article
- A NeuroD1 AAV-Based Gene Therapy for Functional Brain Repair in Alzheimer's Disease-Like Non-Human Primate Model.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Neuroinflammation after stroke: initiation, amplification and therapeutic prospects.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Unraveling Etiological Indications and Therapeutic Implications of Familial Cerebral Cavernous Malformations in the Dawn of Gene Therapy for Monogenic Conditions.Current gene therapy · 2025Article
- Pathophysiology and Management Strategies for Post-Stroke Spasticity: An Update Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AAV-PHP.eB depends on endothelial cells to highly transduce the central nervous system (CNS) and is widely used for intravenous gene therapy. However, the transduction profile and therapeutic efficiency after endothelial cell injury such as ischemic stroke is largely unknown. In this study, we tested the transduction profiles of AAV-PHP.eB and developed intravenous NeuroD1 gene therapy to treat ischemic stroke in mice. We found that AAV-PHP.eB-GFP control virus crossed the BBB and infected brain cells efficiently in normal brain. However, after stroke, AAV-PHP.eB-GFP control virus was highly restricted in the blood vessels. Surprisingly, after switching to therapeutic vector AAV-PHP.eB-NeuroD1-GFP, the viral vector successfully crossed blood vessels and infected brain cells. Using Tie2-cre transgenic mice, we demonstrated that NeuroD1 regulated endothelial gene expression to modulate AAV-PHP.eB transduction. Following the changes of signaling pathways in endothelial cells, NeuroD1 effectively protected BBB integrity, attenuated neuroinflammation, inhibited neuron apoptosis and rescued motor deficits after ischemic stroke. Moreover, NeuroD1 over-expression in brain cells further promoted neural regeneration. These results indicate that intravenous gene therapy using AAV-PHP.eB for ischemic stroke differs from intracranial gene therapy and NeuroD1 intravenous delivery using AAV-PHP.eB efficiently rescue both vascular damage and neuronal loss, providing an advancing therapeutic treatment for stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.