ReviewStudies in health technology and informatics2024
End Users' Perceived Engagement with Clinical Dashboards: A Rapid Review.
Review in Studies in health technology and informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Designing AI-Enabled Video Monitoring Clinician Dashboard for Neuropsychiatric Symptoms: A Survey of User Needs.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry. Open science, education, and practice · 2026Article
- An evaluation of the clinician-facing research dashboards from the Toronto Adolescent and Youth (TAY) Cohort Study in mental health care.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical dashboards are an emerging and fast-evolving technology used to support frontline clinicians' practice. Understanding end users' perceived engagement with clinical dashboards is essential to co-design, implementation, and adoption. There is a lack of literature exploring the integration of dashboards into clinical workflow. This rapid review explores clinical end users' perceived engagement with dashboards that support workflow. We conducted a literature search in PubMed and CINAHL. Four articles met our eligibility criteria. Findings reveal variations in taxonomy and measures used to evaluate clinicians' perceived engagement. There are also a variety of reported barriers and facilitators to adoption. Standardized frameworks and vocabulary are needed to facilitate a common understanding of clinical end users' perceived engagement with dashboards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.