Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38269952›Full record

ArticleStudies in health technology and informatics2024

Health-Analytics Data to Evidence Suite (HADES): Open-Source Software for Observational Research.

Martijn Schuemie, Jenna Reps, Adam Black, Frank Defalco, Lee Evans, Egill Fridgeirsson, James P Gilbert, Chris Knoll, Martin Lavallee, Gowtham A Rao and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Studies in health technology and informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Evaluating large-scale propensity score adjustment when sample size is small.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Martijn SchuemieObservational Health Data Science and Informatics, New York, NY, USA.
Jenna RepsObservational Health Data Science and Informatics, New York, NY, USA.
Adam BlackObservational Health Data Science and Informatics, New York, NY, USA.
Frank DefalcoObservational Health Data Science and Informatics, New York, NY, USA.
Lee EvansObservational Health Data Science and Informatics, New York, NY, USA.
Egill FridgeirssonObservational Health Data Science and Informatics, New York, NY, USA.
James P GilbertObservational Health Data Science and Informatics, New York, NY, USA.
Chris KnollObservational Health Data Science and Informatics, New York, NY, USA.
Martin LavalleeObservational Health Data Science and Informatics, New York, NY, USA.
Gowtham A RaoObservational Health Data Science and Informatics, New York, NY, USA.
Peter RijnbeekObservational Health Data Science and Informatics, New York, NY, USA.
Katy SadowskiObservational Health Data Science and Informatics, New York, NY, USA.
Anthony SenaObservational Health Data Science and Informatics, New York, NY, USA.
Joel SwerdelObservational Health Data Science and Informatics, New York, NY, USA.
Ross D WilliamsObservational Health Data Science and Informatics, New York, NY, USA.
Marc SuchardObservational Health Data Science and Informatics, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Genomics, GPUs, and Next Generation Computational StatisticsR01HG006139 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SOBEL, ERIC · 2011 to 2023
$5.1M
Statistical Innovation to Integrate Sequences and Phenotypes for Scalable Phylodynamic InferenceR01AI153044 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Marc A. Suchard · 2021 to 2026
$2.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006139NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI153044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Health-Analytics Data to Evidence Suite (HADES) is an open-source software collection developed by Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI). It executes directly against healthcare data such as electronic health records and administrative claims, that have been converted to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model. Using advanced analytics, HADES performs characterization, population-level causal effect estimation, and patient-level prediction, potentially across a federated data network, allowing patient-level data to remain locally while only aggregated statistics are shared. Designed to run across a wide array of technical environments, including different operating systems and database platforms, HADES uses continuous integration with a large set of unit tests to maintain reliability. HADES implements OHDSI best practices, and is used in almost all published OHDSI studies, including some that have directly informed regulatory decisions.

Indexed as

Data ScienceElectronic Health RecordsDatabases, FactualHumansObservational Studies as TopicReproducibility of ResultsSoftwareepidemiologymachine learningObservational researchopen-sourcesoftware

Identifiers

PMID38269952
PMCPMC10868467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.