Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38269616›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2024

Use of genotypic HIV DNA testing: a DELPHI-type consensus.

Elisabeth Andre-Garnier, Laurence Bocket, Thomas Bourlet, Laurent Hocqueloux, Quentin Lepiller, Anne Maillard, Sandrine Reigadas, Guillaume Barriere, François Durand, Brigitte Montes and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabeth Andre-GarnierVirology Department, University Hospital Nantes, CIC 1413 Nantes, France.
Laurence BocketVirology Department, University Hospital Lille, Lille, France.
Thomas BourletInfectious Agents and Hygiene Department, University Hospital of Saint Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Laurent HocquelouxInfectious and Tropical Diseases Department, University Hospital Orléans, Orléans, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2264-4822
Quentin LepillerVirology Department, University Hospital Besançon, Besançon, France.
Anne MaillardVirology Department, University Hospital Rennes, Rennes, France.
Sandrine ReigadasGilead Sciences S.A.S., Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Guillaume BarriereGilead Sciences S.A.S., Boulogne-Billancourt, France.ORCID 0009-0006-4776-4827
François DurandGilead Sciences S.A.S., Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Brigitte MontesVirology Department, University Hospital Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Karl SteficBacteriology, Virology and Hospital Hygene Department, University of Tours, INSERM U1259 MAVIVH, University Hospital Tours, Tours, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9686-9194
Anne-Geneviève MarcelinVirology Departement, Sorbonne University, INSERM, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, AP-HP, University Hospitals Pitié-Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, 83, Boulevard de l'hôpital, Paris 75013, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4808-8999
Gilead Sciences (France) · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne · FRCentre hospitalier universitaire d'Orléans · FRInserm · FRUniversité de Lille · FRUniversité de Tours · FR

Funding

Gilead Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAs many disparities in the clinical use of HIV DNA sequencing are observed, a DELPHI-type consensus was initiated in France to homogenize use, techniques and interpretation of results.

methodsBased on a literature review and clinical experience, a steering committee (SC) of eight virologists and one infectious disease specialist formulated statements. Statements were submitted to an independent and anonymous electronic vote of virologists and HIV clinicians in France, between October 2022 and December 2022.

resultsThe SC developed 20 statements grouped into six categories: clinical situations for the use of HIV DNA genotyping; techniques for performing HIV DNA genotyping; consideration of apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme (APOBEC) mutations; genotyping results reporting; recycling of antiretrovirals; and availability of HIV DNA genotyping tests and delays. Twenty-one virologists and 47 clinicians participated in two voting rounds and 18/20 (90%) assertions reached a 'strong' consensus. For example, that prior genotyping on HIV DNA is useful for clinical decision-making when considering switching to some long-acting regimens or to reduce the number of antiretroviral agents in virologically suppressed patients for whom RNA data are unavailable/not exploitable/not sufficiently informative. Two statements achieved no consensus: reporting any detected viral minority population for discussion in multidisciplinary meetings (virologists), and possible risk of virological failure when using a second-generation InSTI plus lamivudine or emtricitabine regimen in patients with undetectable viral load within ≥1 year and in the presence of a documented M184V mutation within the last 5 years (clinicians).

conclusionsThis DELPHI-type consensus will facilitate the strengthening and harmonization of good practice when performing HIV DNA sequencing.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsAnti-Retroviral AgentsDNAGenotypeHumansAnti-HIV AgentsAnti-Retroviral AgentsDNA

Identifiers

PMID38269616
PMCPMC10904721
OpenAlexW4391229156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.