Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38269448›Full record

ArticleJournal of health psychology2024

Confirmation of COVID-19 infection status and reporting of Long COVID symptoms in a population-based birth cohort: No evidence of a nocebo effect.

Catherine Ia Macleod-Hall, Marcus R Munafò, Maddy L Dyer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine Ia Macleod-HallUniversity Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0487-0674
Marcus R MunafòUniversity of Bristol, UK.
Maddy L DyerUniversity of Bristol, UK.
National Institute for Health Research · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00032/7Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some patients with COVID-19 develop symptoms after the acute infection, known as 'Long COVID'. We examined whether or not confirmation of COVID-19 infection status could act as a nocebo, using data from questionnaires distributed to the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children cohort. We examined associations between confirmation of COVID-19 infection status (confirmed by a positive test vs unconfirmed) and reporting of Long COVID symptoms. We explored the roles of sex and anxiety as potential moderators. There was no clear evidence of a strong association between confirmation of COVID-19 infection status and the Long COVID composite score, physical or psychological symptoms or duration of symptoms. There was no clear evidence of moderation by sex or anxiety. We therefore found no evidence of a nocebo effect. Our data suggest that this psychological mechanism does not play a role in the medical symptomatology experienced by patients with Long COVID.

Indexed as

AnxietyCOVID-19Nocebo EffectAdolescentAdultBirth CohortFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesALSPACchildren of the 90scoronavirusLong COVIDnocebopandemic

Identifiers

PMID38269448
PMCPMC11144352
OpenAlexW4391225204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.