Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38269207›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2024

Tinnitus prevalence, associated characteristics, and related healthcare use in the United States: a population-level analysis.

Shelley Batts, Konstantina M Stankovic

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06821893 (Vagus Auricular Stimulation for Tinnitus), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06821893 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Vagus Auricular Stimulation for Tinnitus

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2025 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsTinnitusArmsVibrational stimulation, Sham
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Tinnitus.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Causal Effects Between Anxiety-Depressive and Subjective Tinnitus in Europe: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shelley BattsDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Konstantina M StankovicDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Neurosciences Institute · USStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Tinnitus is a potentially disabling condition with few treatments. We examined the prevalence and characteristics of tinnitus among demographic groups in the United States (US) and assessed associated factors and tinnitus-related healthcare. Methods: We included adults with and without bothersome tinnitus from the nationally representative 2014 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS; raw n = 36,697), the latest year with tinnitus data. We evaluated tinnitus prevalence and characteristics (frequency, severity, duration) overall and among groups defined by sex and race/ethnicity. Logistic regression with adjusted Wald tests were used for comparisons in NHIS-weighted populations by sex and race/ethnicity, and to evaluate associations between demographic/medical characteristics and noise exposure on tinnitus risk. Findings: The US prevalence of tinnitus was 11.2% (95% CI: 10.8%, 11.7%; ∼27 million people) in 2014. Of those with tinnitus, 41.2% always had symptoms and 28.3% had ≥15 years symptom duration; the rates were significantly higher among men vs. women and non-Hispanic (nHW) vs. Hispanic Whites (HW), Blacks, or other ethnicity. Significantly more women vs. men and HW vs. nHW reported severe tinnitus. Sex and race/ethnicity, except Asian, were not significantly associated with tinnitus when age, otologic/medical disorders, and noise exposure were included in the model. Significantly lower rates of all minority groups discussed tinnitus with a doctor compared to nHW, and among those who did, Blacks were significantly less likely to receive tinnitus evaluation than nHWs. Interpretation: Tinnitus prevalence varies across US demographic groups and racial differences were identified in the delivery of tinnitus-related healthcare. Funding: Rich Robbins, Bertarelli Foundation Endowed Professorship.

Indexed as

Health care equityHearing lossNational health interview surveyOtologic healthcarePrevalenceTinnitusUnited States

Identifiers

PMID38269207
PMCPMC10806285
OpenAlexW4390637522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.