ArticleAPL bioengineering2024
A fully automated deep learning approach for coronary artery segmentation and comprehensive characterization.
Article in APL bioengineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Craniofacial Artery Segmentation with Vessel Enhancement-Guided Deep Learning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- 3D Convolutional Neural Network for Predicting Clinical Outcome from Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Non-invasive Computational Techniques for Diagnosing Myocardial Ischemia: Challenges and Future of FFRAnnals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- A novel hybrid segmentation method coupled with deep learning for coronary artery extraction from coronary CT angiography.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Design Rules for Robust Coronary Artery Segmentation: A Systematic Analysis of Dataset Size, Windowing, Architectures, and Vessel Geometry.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Innovations In Artificial Intelligence-Guided Atherosclerosis Cardiovascular Imaging: From Detection to Prognosis.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
- Effect of SnapShot Freeze 2 on Reducing Pulsation Artifacts in Coronary Artery Imaging of Patients With High Heart Rates.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Coronary CT angiography evaluation with artificial intelligence for individualized medical treatment of atherosclerosis: a Consensus Statement from the QCI Study Group.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Anatomically Guided Cascaded U-Net Ensemble for Coronary Artery Calcification Segmentation in Cardiac CT.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Technological Evolution and Research Trends of Intelligent Question-Answering Systems in Healthcare.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Machine Learning for Coronary Plaque Characterization: A Multimodal Review of OCT, IVUS, and CCTA.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- An Unsupervised Learning Algorithm for the Automatic Classification of Coronary Artery Lesions.Cureus · 2025Article
- Auto-segmentation, radiomic reproducibility, and comparison of radiomics between manual and AI-derived segmentations for coronary arteries in cardiac [EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging and Interventional Cardiology: Emerging Trends and Clinical Implications.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Review
- An Artificial Intelligence-Based Non-Invasive Approach for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Stratification in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients: A Narrative Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) allows detailed assessment of early markers associated with coronary artery disease (CAD), such as coronary artery calcium (CAC) and tortuosity (CorT). However, their analysis can be time-demanding and biased. We present a fully automated pipeline that performs (i) coronary artery segmentation and (ii) CAC and CorT objective analysis. Our method exploits supervised learning for the segmentation of the lumen, and then, CAC and CorT are automatically quantified. 281 manually annotated CCTA images were used to train a two-stage U-Net-based architecture. The first stage employed a 2.5D U-Net trained on axial, coronal, and sagittal slices for preliminary segmentation, while the second stage utilized a multichannel 3D U-Net for refinement. Then, a geometric post-processing was implemented: vessel centerlines were extracted, and tortuosity score was quantified as the count of branches with three or more bends with change in direction forming an angle >45°. CAC scoring relied on image attenuation. CAC was detected by setting a patient specific threshold, then a region growing algorithm was applied for refinement. The application of the complete pipeline required <5 min per patient. The model trained for coronary segmentation yielded a Dice score of 0.896 and a mean surface distance of 1.027 mm compared to the reference ground truth. Tracts that presented stenosis were correctly segmented. The vessel tortuosity significantly increased locally, moving from proximal, to distal regions (p < 0.001). Calcium volume score exhibited an opposite trend (p < 0.001), with larger plaques in the proximal regions. Volume score was lower in patients with a higher tortuosity score (p < 0.001). Our results suggest a linked negative correlation between tortuosity and calcific plaque formation. We implemented a fast and objective tool, suitable for population studies, that can help clinician in the quantification of CAC and various coronary morphological parameters, which is helpful for CAD risk assessment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.