ArticleAJP reports2024
Bicoastal Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Therapeutic Dilemma.
Article in AJP reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the potential for severe maternal morbidity and even mortality, pregnancy-associated spontaneous coronary artery dissection (P-SCAD) often presents as a clinical conundrum. While current recommendations encourage coronary interventions when medically indicated even during pregnancy, the hesitation still understandably exists. Meanwhile, given the rarity of the condition, the guidelines for management are still based on expert consensus. We present a case of P-SCAD in a 38-year-old woman with initial presentation at 28 weeks' gestation and recurrence at 9 days postpartum. A unique complication of this case is its transcontinental nature: the initial event occurred while the patient was on vacation across the country from her home. Questions arose not only with regard to her immediate management and care but also when she would be able to travel and how her complex care would be continued cross-country. This case raised important questions regarding the antepartum management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). It also highlights the importance of multidisciplinary care, especially with a cardio-obstetrics team, in the management of P-SCAD and emphasizes the role for universal screening for cardiac diseases in pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.