ArticleiScience2024
Development and validation of a semi-supervised deep learning model for automatic retinopathy of prematurity staging.
Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- An Interpretable System for Screening the Severity Level of Retinopathy in Premature Infants Using Deep Learning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is currently one of the leading causes of infant blindness worldwide. Recently significant progress has been made in deep learning-based computer-aided diagnostic methods. However, deep learning often requires a large amount of annotated data for model optimization, but this requires long hours of effort by experienced doctors in clinical scenarios. In contrast, a large number of unlabeled images are relatively easy to obtain. In this paper, we propose a new semi-supervised learning framework to reduce annotation costs for automatic ROP staging. We design two consistency regularization strategies, prediction consistency loss and semantic structure consistency loss, which can help the model mine useful discriminative information from unlabeled data, thus improving the generalization performance of the classification model. Extensive experiments on a real clinical dataset show that the proposed method promises to greatly reduce the labeling requirements in clinical scenarios while achieving good classification performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.