Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38269046›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2024

Clinical impact of pharmaceutical consultations in patients treated for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (BPCObs study).

Djamila Hachemi, Géraldine Leguelinel-Blache, Sophie Bouvet, Clarisse Roux-Marson, Nathalie Plouvier, Jean-Marie Kinowski, Christel Castelli, Florent Dubois

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03704545 (Clinical Impact of Pharmaceutical Consultations in Patients Treated for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease at Home), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03704545 nacompletednot on this map

Clinical Impact of Pharmaceutical Consultations in Patients Treated for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease at Home

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesRan2019 to 2021Enrolled174ConditionsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseArmsPharmaceutical consultation at the hospital, Pharmaceutical consultation at the pharmacy, Follow-up pharmaceutical consultation at the pharmacy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Djamila HachemiDepartment of Pharmacy, CHU Nimes, Univ Montpellier, Nimes, France.
Géraldine Leguelinel-BlacheDepartment of Pharmacy, CHU Nimes, Univ Montpellier, Nimes, France.
Sophie BouvetDesbrest Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health (IDESP), Univ Montpellier, INSERM, Montpellier, France.
Clarisse Roux-MarsonDepartment of Pharmacy, CHU Nimes, Univ Montpellier, Nimes, France.
Nathalie PlouvierDepartment of Pulmonology, CHU Nimes, Univ Montpellier, Nimes, France.
Jean-Marie KinowskiDepartment of Pharmacy, CHU Nimes, Univ Montpellier, Nimes, France.
Christel CastelliDepartment of Law and Health Economics, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Florent DuboisDepartment of Pharmacy, CHU Nimes, Univ Montpellier, Nimes, France.
Inserm · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an irreversible chronic respiratory disease which outcome depends on medication adherence. Pharmacists may increase this adherence by advising patients on inhaler devices proper use. This paper presents the protocol for a randomized controlled trial, which assesses impact of pharmaceutical consultations on COPD exacerbations, medical care, adherence to inhaler devices and quality of life. Methods: This trial will include 226 COPD patients treated with inhaler devices: 94 in a control group, 66 receiving a pharmaceutical consultation at hospital and 66 receiving up to 12 pharmaceutical consultations corresponding to dispensing at their community pharmacy. The aim of these interventions is to inform patients about COPD medication, train them in the use of inhaler devices and improve adherence. Patients included by hospital pharmacist will be randomly assigned to the control and hospital experimental groups. Community pharmacists (CP) will include patients in the experimental community group. CPs will follow-up all study patients for 12 months. Primary outcome is the mean number of COPD exacerbations. Secondary outcomes include number of medical consultations, emergency visits and hospitalizations, patients' adherence devices and quality of life. Discussion: This is the first French trial which assesses both hospital and community pharmaceutical interventions on COPD patients. Study limitations include recruitment and CP adherence to follow-up. Indeed, the success of this trial depends on the willingness of CPs to collect the data. This work is the first step towards building a network of CPs trained for clinical research. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03704545. Registered on October 12th, 2018. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03704545?cond=COPD&cntry=FR&city=nimes&draw=2&rank=1.

Indexed as

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)Clinical pharmacistMedication adherencePatient educationPharmaceutical services

Identifiers

PMID38269046
PMCPMC10805915
OpenAlexW4389990155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.