Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38268993›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Successful Retrieval of 35 Razors From the Stomach via Upper Gastrointestinal (GI) Endoscopy: A Case Report.

Mostafa Shehata, Hosameldin Abdelrahman Dafalla, Yashbir Singh

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mostafa ShehataGastroenterology, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, ARE.
Hosameldin Abdelrahman DafallaGastroenterology, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, ARE.
Yashbir SinghRadiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adult ingestion of foreign bodies in the digestive system is a common clinical challenge, often involving mentally impaired individuals, criminals, and drug dealers or occurring accidentally. Encounters with multiple sharp foreign bodies are infrequent and pose significant risks, including gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, perforation, internal fistulas, and infection. The choice between endoscopy and emergency surgery for removal is contentious, with the less invasive endoscopy typically favored as the first line of management, depending on the foreign body's location and endoscopic accessibility. The current literature on the treatment of numerous sharp foreign bodies is sparse. This case report illustrates the successful endoscopic removal of a large quantity of sharp foreign bodies (35 half blades) from the upper GI tract, utilizing various extraction tools. It also aims to contribute to the existing literature regarding management strategies for ingested sharp foreign bodies. A comprehensive account is provided of the clinical presentation, imaging studies, consultations, and endoscopic procedures performed, culminating in the patient's safe discharge from our facility.

Indexed as

endoscopyoverturepica syndromesharp foreign body ingestionupper gi

Identifiers

PMID38268993
PMCPMC10807475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.