Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38268795›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2023

A reinforcement learning model with choice traces for a progressive ratio schedule.

Keiko Ihara, Yu Shikano, Sae Kato, Sho Yagishita, Kenji F Tanaka, Norio Takata

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Keiko IharaDivision of Brain Sciences, Institute for Advanced Medical Research, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yu ShikanoDivision of Brain Sciences, Institute for Advanced Medical Research, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Sae KatoDivision of Brain Sciences, Institute for Advanced Medical Research, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Sho YagishitaCenter for Disease Biology and Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenji F TanakaDivision of Brain Sciences, Institute for Advanced Medical Research, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Norio TakataDivision of Brain Sciences, Institute for Advanced Medical Research, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Keio University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The progressive ratio (PR) lever-press task serves as a benchmark for assessing goal-oriented motivation. However, a well-recognized limitation of the PR task is that only a single data point, known as the breakpoint, is obtained from an entire session as a barometer of motivation. Because the breakpoint is defined as the final ratio of responses achieved in a PR session, variations in choice behavior during the PR task cannot be captured. We addressed this limitation by constructing four reinforcement learning models: a simple Q-learning model, an asymmetric model with two learning rates, a perseverance model with choice traces, and a perseverance model without learning. These models incorporated three behavioral choices: reinforced and non-reinforced lever presses and void magazine nosepokes, because we noticed that male mice performed frequent magazine nosepokes during PR tasks. The best model was the perseverance model, which predicted a gradual reduction in amplitudes of reward prediction errors (RPEs) upon void magazine nosepokes. We confirmed the prediction experimentally with fiber photometry of extracellular dopamine (DA) dynamics in the ventral striatum of male mice using a fluorescent protein (genetically encoded GPCR activation-based DA sensor: GRAB

Indexed as

choice stickinessdopaminefiber photometrymethamphetaminemouseoperant conditioningreward prediction errorventral striatum

Identifiers

PMID38268795
PMCPMC10806202
OpenAlexW4390699342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.