Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38268768›Full record

ArticleJBJS essential surgical techniques

Transcutaneous Osseointegrated Prosthesis Systems (TOPS) for Rehabilitation After Lower Limb Loss: Surgical Pearls.

Horst H Aschoff, Marcus Örgel, Marko Sass, Dagmar-C Fischer, Thomas Mittlmeier

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JBJS essential surgical techniques. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Horst H AschoffDepartment of Traumatology, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2576-8804
Marcus ÖrgelDepartment of Traumatology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9996-2864
Marko SassDepartment of Traumatology, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5781-5081
Dagmar-C FischerDepartment of Pediatrics, University Medical Centre Rostock, Rostock, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6332-0456
Thomas MittlmeierDepartment of Traumatology, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0536-8045
University of Rostock · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The biology of osseointegration of any intramedullary implant depends on the design, the press-fit anchoring, and the loading history of the endoprosthesis. In particular, the material and surface of the endoprosthetic stem are designed to stimulate on- and in-growth of bone as the prerequisite for stable and long-lasting integration Description: We present a 2-step implantation process for the standard Endo-Fix Stem (ESKA Orthopaedic Handels) into the residual femur and describe the osseointegration of the prosthesis Alternatives: Socket prostheses for transfemoral or transtibial amputees have been the gold standard for decades. However, such patients face many challenges to recover autonomous mobility, and an estimated 30% of all amputees report unsatisfactory rehabilitation and 10% cannot use a socket prosthesis at all. Rationale: Transcutaneous osseointegrated prosthetic systems especially benefit patients who are unable to tolerate socket suspension systems, such as those with short residual limbs and/or bilateral limb loss. The use of a firmly integrated endoprosthetic stem allows patients and surgeons to avoid many of the limitations associated with conventional socket prostheses, such as the need to continually fit and refit the socket to match an ever-changing stump Expected Outcomes: Despite subtle differences between the systems utilized for the intramedullary anchoring of the prosthetic stem, all data indicate that mobility and quality of life significantly increase while the frequency of stoma infections is remarkably low as long as the patient is able to follow simple postoperative care protocols Important Tips: The impaction pressure of the implant depends on the diameter of the implant and the quality of the residual bone (i.e., the time interval between the amputation and the implantation of the prosthetic stem). The extent of reaming of the inner cortex of the residual bone must be adapted to these conditions. The standard Endo-Fix Stem and BADAL X implant are both slightly curved to adapt to the physiological shape of the femur. Thus, the surgeon must be sure to insert the implant in the right position and at the correct rotational alignment. When preparing a short femoral stump, carefully identify the exact transection level in order to obtain enough bone stock to anchor the implant in the correct intramedullary position for an additional locking screw into the femoral neck and head. Depending on the residual length of the humerus and the press-fit stability of the implant, the utilization of locking screws is optional, as a notch at the distal end of the implant guarantees primary rotational stability. Acronyms and Abbreviations: TOPS = transcutaneous osseointegrated prosthesis systemsEEP = endo-exo prosthesisMRSA = methicillin-resistant

Identifiers

PMID38268768
PMCPMC10805461
OpenAlexW4390904302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.